VIN tampering

Status
Not open for further replies.

Canon_Mutant

Royal Smart Person
Aug 15, 2015
1,159
1,420
113
This relates to an older car I'm interested in but I've noticed some VIN stuff going on with some of these older cars being sold by "reputable" collector dealers.

Notice how the 4 down in the serial number clearly looks like a 4 but the 2nd, 3rd, digits that signify whether it's a real 442 don't? If they can stamp a clear 4 in the serial number, and frankly all the other numbers, why can't they stamp a clear 4 up in 2 and 3 where it matters? This naturally happens to be the VIN on the one I'm interested in. Looking at others, actual 442s tend to be a LOT more clear than this. For a not quite all original actual 442 with the right block, wrong heads, wrong wheels, few other minor things, non standard gray/silver color, which I kinda like, the price is about right for it if it was an original 442. If it is just a ground up clone then it's probably $15-20K too much.

Worrying about nothin?

Good one first . . .
501uu.jpg


The one I'm interested in . . .

10587446-1971-oldsmobile-442-std.jpg


The car . . . pretty sharp!
10587333-1971-oldsmobile-442-std.jpg

10587352-1971-oldsmobile-442-std-c.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users

Qdub24

Royal Smart Person
Sep 6, 2006
1,796
785
113
Columbus, GA
Those VIN tags look suspect to me, but I'm no expert.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: 1 user

565bbchevy

Geezer
Aug 8, 2011
9,614
12,683
113
Michigan
The car is very sharp, I am no expert on vin tags either but knowing how cars went together back then I would almost say the second vin looks more original.
To me on both vins the last 4 appears to be a different style than the first pair of fours, more noticeable on the first vin though.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: 2 users

fleming442

Captain Tenneal
Dec 26, 2013
13,046
24,216
113
I'd be EXTREMELY suspect of any car being passed off as a w30. They are very difficult to document. Judging from the pics, it's just another flipper trying to pass off a clone.
 

oldsmobile joe

Royal Smart Person
Nov 12, 2015
2,067
3,053
113
mpls
i recommend finding and paying an expert from the local olds club to look it over.
back in the 60s the factory started stamping the frames with the vin to help fight car theft and chop shops. so it the frame is original, the number on it should match the number on the dash. where is this number? i don't know, but an olds club expert would know.
looks like 71 model, in 72 the 442s were down graded from an acutral model with its own vin code to an option package.
i like the car you chose, good luck, joe
 
  • Agree
  • Dislike
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users

online170

G-Body Guru
Oct 28, 2010
726
319
63
A few comments, but firstly, with that much money, you can never be too thorough.

1) If someone is claiming it to be a 442, then they should expect a ton of documentation verification, and a "reputable" dealer would have already started the process and done most of it for you. If they havent, thats OK, but any hesitation or unwillingness to let you conduct your own verification is a major red flag. It absolutely has to have the buildsheet, if not, walk away. There is usually a registry for these types of cars, and people willing to do a deep dive search for you on this stuff. Buick has their GSX, Ford has their Boss, MOPAR has their HEMI etc... All these have registries where you can send in documentation and have it verified.

2) Cross referencing is your friend. Match the VIN, body TAG, and driveline numbers as best as possible. Non-numbers matching engine/trans/diff greatly reduce the value of the car. Look for clues, usually people who do clones don't go the full mile, unless it was done to concours level. There is always something off about the car, it might be a gauge cluster, or an option, or part somewhere that gives it away.

3) Forensic analysis. Its very difficult to remove something, and replace it then make it look like it has aged 50 years and was never tampered with. Look closely at the rivets, if they look like they were installed in 1970, thats excellent, and work backwards from there. The VIN is in a high corrosion location, so some pitting is to be expected. But everything should look "similar" around it. If you have patches of rust everywhere, but then the numbers that count are perfect unpitted material, then thats a red flag.

4) Imagine yourself trying to sell this car. The price you ask, will be directly proportional to how well you can prove its a real 442. If its a real 442, but they cannot prove it with documentation, then in today's market, its not a real 442. Be thorough, dont be shy of paperwork, and buy with confidence. Dont shell out to bridge the gap for insurances they cannot provide with paperwork. It all has to check out.


This is one of the reasons ill never be into the museum piece type cars. In today's market it comes down to paperwork, and alot of times its missing.
 
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: 4 users

DRIVEN

Geezer
Apr 25, 2009
8,074
14,533
113
*CENSORED*
I'm 100% with online170 on this. If you are buying a "special" car, you're essentially paying for the documentation and provenance. If you're buying for fun you'd be paying clone price with no expectation on later ROI.
Whether the VIN tag is legit, looks okay to me. I'm no expert though and I'd be interested in pile of documentation.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: 1 users

ssn696

Living in the Past
Supporting Member
Jul 19, 2009
5,546
6,671
113
Permanent Temporary
That was a lot of work to turn 1s into 4s and have it look so obvious. I'm curious what a '31187...' translates into.
 

Ribbedroof

Comic Book Super Hero
Supporting Member
Jan 4, 2009
4,900
6,992
113
Wellston, OK
There was no 31187 on Olds Vins, second digit would have been either a 3 or 4, depending on series

I would want to inspect the car personally, but I have seen some pretty sloppy VIN plates on cars of this era, including grossly misaligned character groups. It does appear to have very poorly formed 4s.
 

ssn696

Living in the Past
Supporting Member
Jul 19, 2009
5,546
6,671
113
Permanent Temporary
There was no 31187 on Olds Vins, second digit would have been either a 3 or 4, depending on series.
So there is hope for the seller...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

GBodyForum is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com. Amazon, the Amazon logo, AmazonSupply, and the AmazonSupply logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.

Please support GBodyForum Sponsors

Classic Truck Consoles Dixie Restoration Depot UMI Performance

Contact [email protected] for info on becoming a sponsor