Roof Chopped G-Bodies?

I agree they look better with the roof on, maybe its because i have seen so few of them and am not used to it. Don't get me wrong, i like the cars and they look better than anything i could even dream of doing myself, but i like roofs. I saw an 84 GP convert on ebay a while back that the seller called factory or something similar. Nice clean job like these cars so it must have been the same company. Anyone know how many G-convertables were created?

I seen a low rider early g body monte carlo with the roof chopped it looked like a clown car.I wish i had a picture of it.

Well heres what you are looking for. Heres some ugly gbody mods in this thread and some really good looking ones. I believe everyone uses a chrystler lebaron top. http://www.layitlow.com/forums/index.ph ... 130347&hl=

damn looks like a common project huh?

to me "chopped top" means the roof has been lowered a few inches and I don't think gbody's look good with that look, but the convertable thing is kind of growing on me.

For sure a common project. I wouldnt do it IMO.

Definitly like the look of the Monte convertibles. I saw a pic of a Regal, IIRC, on cardomain a little while ago. One of their event coverages, at some low-rider show. The front end was easily 8 or 9 ft in the air. Looked good.

itsnotanova said:

to me "chopped top" means the roof has been lowered a few inches .

Click to expand...

Thats what I was thinking also looking at this post.
The one in Leno's garage looks good to me
http://www.jaylenosgarage.com/your_gara ... 6014.shtml

Convertibles looks ghastly and hacked.
The attachment of it doesn't flow with the body and looks to be hacked on and thats why it probably looks bad to most.

I think a Wagon with an inch or 2 removed would look great.

With all that glass , the lines seem a little top heavy.

Massive lowering of the car makes the illusion look worse.