400 sbc build

Status
Not open for further replies.
Boring a 400 .030 over makes a 406.
 
87ttop said:
i thought the connecting rods were the the same in the sbc 350 and 400. What makes the 400 a 406
350 rods are 5.7
400 rods are 5.565 long

Chris.o is right a 400@30 over with either rod is a 406 but useing a 5.7 rod puts less stress on cylinder wall. And is basically a stroker with more cubes then a 383. Also with the 5.7 rod you should run a small base circle cam or you run the risk of connecting rod smaking and breaking cam.
 
well I think I have made up my mind to run with rebuit stock heads with updated springs, retainers, etc. bore it 30 over and go with flat top pistons and i think i want to use my 400 sbc rods because I cant imagine smacking the cam that would kill me. but its not set in stone so you guys keep inputting
 
i belive if you use a 5.7 rod you have grind the head if the bolts to make clearance
 
How do you get 15mpg with 3.73s & a th350? You had to have an egg under the pedal to get 10.0 with our last one and it had less cam. But it did have a fuel slobbering Holley. Still with a tuned Q-jet I think it would have been lucky to get 12.0. It was not near as quick either. Not calling you a BSer just saying as it might be an unrealistic expectation for the OP.
 
dogshit said:
How do you get 15mpg with 3.73s & a th350? You had to have an egg under the pedal to get 10.0 with our last one and it had less cam. But it did have a fuel slobbering Holley. Still with a tuned Q-jet I think it would have been lucky to get 12.0. It was not near as quick either. Not calling you a BSer just saying as it might be an unrealistic expectation for the OP.
Call me what you want and believe what you want. I drove that car everyday for 4yrs made probably 200 12 second passes cruised at 80mph on the highway at and yes got 15 mpg not saying everytime i drove it i am talking taking it easy And driving pretty calm. If i drove it like n ******* i would be lucky to get 10.0. O and that was with a holley 700 dbl pumper.
 
I don't doubt it a bit. The 400 in my El Camino will get 20mpg. Granted, it was built to produce max torque at cruise RPM instead of peak horsepower. It behaves more like a diesel in many ways. Specs: .060" (I know :roll: ), completely stock rotating assy, completely stock 882 heads, Comp XE256H cam, Performer intake, HEI, Q-jet from '77 Cadillac 425, small headers, MY6 transmission with .67(?) overdrive, 3.08 gears. Cruises the freeway at 2200 RPM. It's a great driver/tow combo but I wouldn't call it a performance engine.
 
DRIVEN, That makes sense & is 100% believable. 2480, I am not going to call you any names. I don't have any disrespect for you in fact I appreciate and agree with almost everything I have ever seen you post. Much of it obviously came from experience, helps the OP, and is not general knowledge. Just saying something probably isn't right in that mileage figure. I don't question the 12 second passes at all. Useing Wallace racing's calculators and common 26" tire 80 mph would be 3,900 rpms over 4,000 with normal converter slip. (Unless it was a lock up converter.) I wouldn't want to cruise their but sure. On the mileage I would have to see it to believe it with that gear, trans, & cam. But I don't know maybe a tight converter tall tires and a lean carb or an anomaly. At any rate its all good and I apologize if I came off insultingly as I didn't intend to.
 
dogshit said:
DRIVEN, That makes sense & is 100% believable. 2480, I am not going to call you any names. I don't have any disrespect for you in fact I appreciate and agree with almost everything I have ever seen you post. Much of it obviously came from experience, helps the OP, and is not general knowledge. Just saying something probably isn't right in that mileage figure. I don't question the 12 second passes at all. Useing Wallace racing's calculators and common 26" tire 80 mph would be 3,900 rpms over 4,000 with normal converter slip. (Unless it was a lock up converter.) I wouldn't want to cruise their but sure. On the mileage I would have to see it to believe it with that gear, trans, & cam. But I don't know maybe a tight converter tall tires and a lean carb or an anomaly. At any rate its all good and I apologize if I came off insultingly as I didn't intend to.
No its cool no disrespect taken. It had 28" tires a 2800 stall that was so tight i would think it was stock. Car at 80 for some reason never had rpms any where nere 3900 if i remember it was more like 32-3300 But again i seen so i believe it if the other way around i would probably be in your shoes.
 
can I run a 406 on regular pump gas. I havent made a concrete descision because I want the 406 but this will turn into a expensive build if I go this way. My first idea was too go with a stock rebuid with a comp 292. Will this give me a little more horsepower and I really want the cam sound! Is this possible with just a stock rebuild plus flat tops and 5.7 rods w/small base circle 292?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

GBodyForum is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com. Amazon, the Amazon logo, AmazonSupply, and the AmazonSupply logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.

Please support GBodyForum Sponsors

Classic Truck Consoles Dixie Restoration Depot UMI Performance

Contact [email protected] for info on becoming a sponsor