Fuel Tank Swap

Status
Not open for further replies.
crucial118 said:
ken87cutlass said:
...Thanks, for the pics and information. Now I can refinish the tank.
No problem. You doing tb injection or multiport?

Multi port, going with the Accel system. One of the guys on ROP is a dealer, he's setting me up a base map to get me going and I have a shop, Willy's Carbs, relatively close that I'll go to to get it fine tuned. I know, I said Will'ys Carbs but they have a chassis dyno and a really good FI guy also.

MrLightning said:
Out of curiosity, whats the reason anybody would switch from a standard cutlass tank to a GN tank? is there that much of a difference in volume for the trouble?

As was mentioned, the GN tank has a "bucket" if you will installed underneath the fuel pump hanger. The smaller bucket receives the fuel from the return line staying "full" and keeps the pump from sucking air. Not critical on a carb car because the carb has float bowls full of fuel. On fuel injected cars, if you suck air into the fuel line you will have problems with fuel starvation.
 
liquidh8 said:
SO, to answer your question, if you want to run Fuel Injection, get one of these tanks, and the correct sender/pump hanger. (GN/FI monte)

Ok, got the tank figured out and came to the fuel pump hanger. I did not realize that the GN fuel return line was the 1/4 inch one!!!

I am running a 3/8's supply line to the front and was planning on running one to the back for a return. That begs the question of how to connect the 3/8 return line to the 1/4 inch return on the hanger? Is the 1/4 line sufficient or will this be a restriction that will cause problems?
 
The 1/4 return was a restriction for my setup. It sent fuel pressure to around 100psi. I ended up running a separate 5/16 line back to the tank and drilled a hole at the top and installed a brass 5/16 barb fitting(from Home Depot) with a nut directly to the tank. I also used a little JB Weld around the fitting, on the outside, to make everything leak proof. This brought my fuel pressure back down. You could try a reducer fitting at the 1/4 line, but too many clamps = too many chances to leak.
 
crucial118 said:
The 1/4 return was a restriction for my setup. It sent fuel pressure to around 100psi. I ended up running a separate 5/16 line back to the tank and drilled a hole at the top and installed a brass 5/16 barb fitting(from Home Depot) with a nut directly to the tank. I also used a little JB Weld around the fitting, on the outside, to make everything leak proof. This brought my fuel pressure back down. You could try a reducer fitting at the 1/4 line, but too many clamps = too many chances to leak.

Got a picture of the fitting?

Did you run a solid line to the bottom of the tank like the original 1/4 line did? IIRC, the factory did this to keep the fuel from becoming aerated.
 
I ran a -5 AN line from my fuel rail to the tank. That's how most plumb in race lines. No, I didn't run a line to the bottom of the tank like the original return line. I was a little worried about that when I installed just the barb fitting, but It seems to be working without it. The only thing I can think It might affect is the gauge float. Sometimes it goes up or down when I floor it, but it usually is pretty static. I guess you could always hook a 5/16 hose to the inside attachment and run that to the bottom of the tank. Hindsight is 20/20. I don't have any pics of the barb attachment, but if you go to Home Depot in the plumbing isle, you will see what I'm talking about.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

GBodyForum is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com. Amazon, the Amazon logo, AmazonSupply, and the AmazonSupply logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.

Please support GBodyForum Sponsors

Classic Truck Consoles Dixie Restoration Depot UMI Performance

Contact [email protected] for info on becoming a sponsor