GM to merge with Chrysler? DISCUSS

Status
Not open for further replies.

Coveted

G-Body Guru
Mar 23, 2008
624
1
0
Sanborn, Ny 14132
By BILL VLASIC and ANDREW ROSS SORKIN
Published: October 10, 2008
DETROIT — General Motors is in preliminary talks about a possible merger with Chrysler, a deal that could drastically remake the landscape of the auto industry by reducing the Big Three of Detroit automakers to the Big Two.

The talks between G.M. and Cerberus Capital Management, the private equity firm that owns Chrysler, began more than a month ago, and the negotiations are not certain to produce a deal. Two people close to the process said the chances of a merger were “50-50” as of Friday and would most likely still take weeks to work out.

A merger would be a historic event, with two of the most iconic names in American industry coming together to survive in an increasingly difficult environment. Both have roots dating back decades in Detroit and, with Ford, long dominated the auto industry — until Japanese and other foreign car makers began making inroads into the American market.

The auto industry is being pummeled from all sides — by high gas prices that have soured consumers on profitable S.U.V.’s, by a softening economy that has scared shoppers away from showrooms, and by tight credit that is making it difficult for willing buyers to obtain loans. Both G.M. and Chrysler have been struggling with product lineups that are out of sync with consumer demand for smaller, more fuel-efficient cars.

General Motors’ stock has fallen from more than $43 a share last year to less than $5, and it is burning through its cash hoard at a rapid rate. Chrysler, as a private company, no longer needs to report its finances.

The meetings between General Motors and Cerberus began more than a month ago, said people familiar with the discussions, and the companies have held several talks involving their most senior executives. Given that both G.M. and Chrysler are struggling, the two sides may determine a merger may not be in their best interests.

The exploratory talks have included debates over various calculations of the savings that would result from a merger, these people said, but neither side has yet to dig into each others’ private financial books and records.

At the same time, Cerberus is continuing to hold talks with other automakers including Nissan and Renault, said people familiar with the discussions. It is unclear at what stage those discussions have reached.

Speculation about a possible bankruptcy filing by G.M. has mounted in recent weeks because of the automaker’s dwindling cash reserves. The automaker had $21 billion in cash on hand at the end of the second quarter, but it was burning through more than $1 billion a month.

The credit rating firm Standard & Poor’s put G.M. on negative credit watch on Thursday.

But G.M. has said it is confident that it can increase its liquidity, and emphasized in a statement released Thursday that it was not considering a bankruptcy filing.

G.M. once commanded about 50 percent of the American vehicle market, but its share so far this year has fallen to 22 percent, according to the research firm Autodata. Chrysler had a market share of about 15 percent before its acquisition in 1998 by Daimler, but its share this year has dwindled to 11 percent.

How government and labor might react to a potential merger of G.M. and Chrysler is unclear. Antitrust questions could be raised, but political issues could be overshadowed by the precarious financial prospects of both automakers.

If G.M., the nation’s largest automaker, combined operations with Chrysler, the smallest of Detroit’s Big Three, they would create an auto giant that would surpass Japan’s Toyota Motor Company, which recently has been battling G.M. for bragging rights as the world’s largest automaker.

A G.M. spokesman declined to comment on any specific talks with Chrysler. “Without referencing this specific rumor, as we’ve often said G.M. officials routinely discuss issues of mutual interest with other automakers,” said the spokesman, Tony Cervone.

There was no immediate comment from Cerberus.

People briefed on the deal said the talks started as an exploration of possible joint venture opportunities between G.M. and Chrysler.

Cerberus acquired an 80.1 percent stake in Chrysler in August 2007 for $7.4 billion from the German automaker Daimler AG.

Under the terms of the deal being discussed, Cerberus would end up owning an unspecified equity stake in G.M.-Chrysler, people briefed on the talks said.

The ramifications of the merger would be enormous in the global auto industry. G.M. and Chrysler together would control more than 35 percent of the United States vehicle market, and be by far the dominant producer of pickup trucks, sport utility vehicles and minivans.

It would also marry such iconic American brands as G.M.’s Chevrolet and Cadillac with Chrysler’s Jeep and Dodge divisions.

However, the potential merger carries enormous risks. Both G.M. and Chrysler are struggling mightily in what is the worst market for vehicle sales in the United States in 15 years.

People close to the discussions said that if the prospective deal did not happen, Cerberus would probably look to Nissan and Renault.

But the marriage of G.M. and Chrysler has far more potential than hitching Chrysler to a foreign automaker. While G.M. and Chrysler may be hamstrung by labor contracts from cutting jobs, the two companies could combine dealers, product lines and advanced vehicle technology.

Bill Vlasic reported from Detroit and Andrew Ross Sorkin from New York. Michael J. de la Merced contributed reporting.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/11/busin ... ref=slogin
 
:shock: are we really in hard times?
 
as much as i don't like this. i believe it's inevitable.
this type of merger has been going around for months among the B3.
i would've thought ford since their stock is at less than $2.50/share.

better 2 american companies than an outside source.

ford is very susceptible to a takeover w/stock so low. i wouldn't be alarmed if toyota or honda took a shot.
 
what, you're surprised? that's chryslers whole business plan for the last 30 years. go bankrupt, get bought out, **** over the company and get rid of them, repeat.
what is interesting is, will they keep the viper? it's the only real american competition for the 'vette.
 
megaladon6 said:
what is interesting is, will they keep the viper? it's the only real american competition for the 'vette.

Chrysler is looking to sell off the viper brand.
3 unnamed companies are bidding to buy it.
One of them is rumoured to be saleen.
That may happen before any merger.
 
What honestly do they offer the average consumer that can be considered good? None of their small and midsize cars are leaders in their markets, and neither offers anything truly fuel efficient. Both concentrated on large trucks and SUV's for far too long and only produced cars grudgingly as if to punish those buyers for not buying a truck. Lack of market diversification is what got them here, and if that is not fixed with brilliant products across the board, a merger does them no good. They need good small cars that are designed in house, not pawned off to Daewoo. Ford is about to bring it's universally acclaimed Fiesta to this country, where is GM with a competitive Vauxhall or Opel product? Anyone can make a nice expensive car, but it takes a really good company to make a nice affordable car. If they can't figure it out, they might as well just stop building cars and become truck companies. After all, it seems that is what they wish to be.

I think this is a bad idea. Neither company has anything to gain from joining the other as both lack marketable product lines in the current economy. They would be better served using the money instead to develop a really good small car line. Let's face it, the Cobalt and the Caliber are not up to the task of taking on the Fit, Civic, Corolla, Versa or even the Yaris. Mediocre fuel economy with the reliability and innovation of an item built by union communists does not a market leader make.
 
85 Cutlass Brougham said:
What honestly do they offer the average consumer that can be considered good? None of their small and midsize cars are leaders in their markets, and neither offers anything truly fuel efficient. Both concentrated on large trucks and SUV's for far too long and only produced cars grudgingly as if to punish those buyers for not buying a truck. Lack of market diversification is what got them here, and if that is not fixed with brilliant products across the board, a merger does them no good. They need good small cars that are designed in house, not pawned off to Daewoo. Ford is about to bring it's universally acclaimed Fiesta to this country, where is GM with a competitive Vauxhall or Opel product? Anyone can make a nice expensive car, but it takes a really good company to make a nice affordable car. If they can't figure it out, they might as well just stop building cars and become truck companies. After all, it seems that is what they wish to be.

I think this is a bad idea. Neither company has anything to gain from joining the other as both lack marketable product lines in the current economy. They would be better served using the money instead to develop a really good small car line. Let's face it, the Cobalt and the Caliber are not up to the task of taking on the Fit, Civic, Corolla, Versa or even the Yaris. Mediocre fuel economy with the reliability and innovation of an item built by union communists does not a market leader make.
They offered smaller cars and midsized cars for a while. People just never bought them so they just lowered production or stopped production of some.

No one could see this problem coming and it probably wouldn't have happened if China/India would limit their population and consumption of oil which has drove gas prices way up over the past 10 years. People continued to buy their big vehicles so they did what every other company would do, increase those production rates and lower the rest.
 
quite honestly the viper is not really a comparison to the vette when it costs close to 100k to get one and less than 70k to get a vette. not really comparable
 
phaZe said:
85 Cutlass Brougham said:
What honestly do they offer the average consumer that can be considered good? None of their small and midsize cars are leaders in their markets, and neither offers anything truly fuel efficient. Both concentrated on large trucks and SUV's for far too long and only produced cars grudgingly as if to punish those buyers for not buying a truck. Lack of market diversification is what got them here, and if that is not fixed with brilliant products across the board, a merger does them no good. They need good small cars that are designed in house, not pawned off to Daewoo. Ford is about to bring it's universally acclaimed Fiesta to this country, where is GM with a competitive Vauxhall or Opel product? Anyone can make a nice expensive car, but it takes a really good company to make a nice affordable car. If they can't figure it out, they might as well just stop building cars and become truck companies. After all, it seems that is what they wish to be.

I think this is a bad idea. Neither company has anything to gain from joining the other as both lack marketable product lines in the current economy. They would be better served using the money instead to develop a really good small car line. Let's face it, the Cobalt and the Caliber are not up to the task of taking on the Fit, Civic, Corolla, Versa or even the Yaris. Mediocre fuel economy with the reliability and innovation of an item built by union communists does not a market leader make.
They offered smaller cars and midsized cars for a while. People just never bought them so they just lowered production or stopped production of some.

No one could see this problem coming and it probably wouldn't have happened if China/India would limit their population and consumption of oil which has drove gas prices way up over the past 10 years. People continued to buy their big vehicles so they did what every other company would do, increase those production rates and lower the rest.

Yes, but did they actually build any good ones? Cavalier, Omni/Horizon, Escort. None of them were good cars compared to their Japanese competition. It's funny how the Japanese made a business model out of small cars in this country for a long time while the big 3 couldn't.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

GBodyForum is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com. Amazon, the Amazon logo, AmazonSupply, and the AmazonSupply logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.

Please support GBodyForum Sponsors

Classic Truck Consoles Dixie Restoration Depot UMI Performance

Contact [email protected] for info on becoming a sponsor