454muscle said:What??? Just one vote for increasing bore (me)? WTF
Whatever happenned to "there's no replacement for displacement"? I know it's relative, but still. True, but you just can't hardly get enough of a displacement increase in most stock blocks form boring to make much difference. Take a sbc 350 for example, .030 over will get you a whopping 5 extra cubes that would result in zero measureable increase in power. While i guaruntee going from 8:1 to 10:1 compression will get gains you don't even need to measure to notice.
And why won't anyone mention the drawbacks of increasing compression, such has added heat, and pinging, etc.. It all depends in how much of an increase you go for. Like it or not the power an engine makes starts out as heat energy. More heat more power.
Or that the increased bore will greatly increase torque. I think you are confusing bore with stroke. Which is also much easier to use to increase you actual displacement than what the bore is.
Assuming that the "increasing compression" means doing it mechanically speaking (as opposed to adding boost via supercharging or turbo or even nitrous -- all of which increase compression).
And yes, I see there are drawbacks to increasing bore size too. The biggest being that most blocks can't be bored enough to make a large increase in displacement.
Not to mention, it all depends on other factors (ie. cam lift/duration, flow rate, etc..) True, but take that 350 I mentioned above. Assuming no other changes than a max overbore vs. say two points of compression increase, only the compression will change the power on any significant level.
It's been stated before but a the better argument would be stroke vs. compression. And even then you reall need to have an intended goal or use decided before you can really choose one over the other.