This isn't a koan or riddle but what he might not be seeing is the politics. In other words what may have driven the decision was some kind of bureaucratic exercise. After all, what is insurance but a bet between the insurer and the insured, using the insured's money, about the probability or odds that an accident or some kind of damage or injury could happen. Any statistician or probability analyst, or even a Las Vegas bookie, taking a peek at this, would state unequivocally that its sucker bet.
Like I have offered before, the insurer may have come into possession of the vehicle and not had the documentation to go with it so it could be sold legally so they offed it to score a few bucks. That potentially being the case, I'd wonder just how many other cars they've dumped using the same method. The other thing here is that, by virtue of age, that GTO is beyond the ten year limit. Whether or not age is a factor in terms of there being insurance available for it or if insurers are refusing to paper older cars due to some kind of increased liability issue? Couldn't day.
Nick
Like I have offered before, the insurer may have come into possession of the vehicle and not had the documentation to go with it so it could be sold legally so they offed it to score a few bucks. That potentially being the case, I'd wonder just how many other cars they've dumped using the same method. The other thing here is that, by virtue of age, that GTO is beyond the ten year limit. Whether or not age is a factor in terms of there being insurance available for it or if insurers are refusing to paper older cars due to some kind of increased liability issue? Couldn't day.
Nick
