#1) 96 (GMT 400)1/2T, 350, 2wd, barely any rust, 160K miles
#2) 99 (GMT800), 1/2T, 4.8, 2wd, barely any rust, 140K miles
Both have similar asking prices and maint records. Is there a huge improvement in the newer series or an increase in reliability?
I'm a cheap DIY'er. Would the 'newer technology' 4.8 be a better choice to last 100 K miles than the GMT 400.
Is the 4.8 that much better in gas consumption? I know the GMT 800 have many electrical issues that can be fixed by DIY - right or wrong?
Is 4wd really needed if you never go offroad but do drive in 3 months of city and Hwy snow? I will be hauling up to probably 6000 lbs(Monte Carlo)
#2) 99 (GMT800), 1/2T, 4.8, 2wd, barely any rust, 140K miles
Both have similar asking prices and maint records. Is there a huge improvement in the newer series or an increase in reliability?
I'm a cheap DIY'er. Would the 'newer technology' 4.8 be a better choice to last 100 K miles than the GMT 400.
Is the 4.8 that much better in gas consumption? I know the GMT 800 have many electrical issues that can be fixed by DIY - right or wrong?
Is 4wd really needed if you never go offroad but do drive in 3 months of city and Hwy snow? I will be hauling up to probably 6000 lbs(Monte Carlo)