7-9/16” from the bottom of the lower ball joint pad to the top of the upper ball joint pad. It’s within a 1/32 of my stock G body spindlesWhat is the height of the spindle?
I contacted CPP a few days ago and asked why they didn't make them taller like the ones they made for A, F, and X bodies. They said G bodies don't need taller spindles. Not sure where they got that ideaWhat is the height of the spindle?
It looked like a stock height spindle but sometimes screen images are skewed so thanks for the clarification.7-9/16” from the bottom of the lower ball joint pad to the top of the upper ball joint pad. It’s within a 1/32 of my stock G body spindles
View attachment 251955
A fact that's not mentioned much/enough about the AFX spindle (former ATS spindle) is the bearing pack set-up is proprietary because of the machining/packaging on the spindle. The bearing packs are high-end replacement parts, but they don't just bolt-on like common OE spindles. Apparently, they are tweaked & utilize a jig to set them up properly for the warranty purpose. That turned me off on them after clearing the purchase price hurdle. I learned this info after purchasing a pair but because of the delay/s in fulfilling my order I cancelled before they shipped (~8 months?).Currently I’m doing some bench racing for future upgrades on my Monte and one thing that’s been stuck in my head is a spindle upgrade.
I’ve been looking at SSM’s “Game Changer” kit, and while it’s the most cost effective out of the box for the gains SSM claims, it comes with a caveat that kinda breaks the deal for me: The spindle SSM offers has clearance issues with the brake kit I’ve been eyeing. Big Brake Upgrade offers sever adapter brackets that can be use to convert A, F, G, X and S10 spindles to the huge 14” rotor and 4 piston Brembo combo that came on the 2010-2015 Camaro SS. BBU’s brackets interfere with the spindle due to the required spacing of the caliper and rotor, and to my understanding there’s no way around this.
So I’m looking for suggestions on what spindles could be swapped into a G with relatively little fuss (or a lot if the benefits are there) without asking for a kidney in return like the AFX spindles from ATS.
I’ll also add that the whole point of this is to use as much stock replacement components as possible so breakage/failures aren’t as much of a hindrance as they would be with an aftermarket setup, like from Wilwood for example. This is why I was interested in BBU’s conversion brackets.
Not knowing their own products is the reason I bought these spindles in the first place- Brake/Bearing fitment is all over the place. CPP’s website lists C5/6/7 brakes will fit under the product image, then in the description states that only C5/6 stuff will work. But you read Summit’s description and it states ‘97-‘14! 2013 is C7 😂It looked like a stock height spindle but sometimes screen images are skewed so thanks for the clarification.
The g-bodys need the tall spindle just like the early AFX platforms. One would think a spindle manufacturer would know the differences between the models but perhaps some of those employees answering questions don't know their own products well.
Yikes, that’s another reason to avoid those besides the price. For $1600+, you’d think the company would trust the end user to be able to maintain them.A fact that's not mentioned much/enough about the AFX spindle (former ATS spindle) is the bearing pack set-up is proprietary because of the machining/packaging on the spindle. The bearing packs are high-end replacement parts, but they don't just bolt-on like common OE spindles. Apparently, they are tweaked & utilize a jig to set them up properly for the warranty purpose. That turned me off on them after clearing the purchase price hurdle. I learned this info after purchasing a pair but because of the delay/s in fulfilling my order I cancelled before they shipped (~8 months?).
My assumption was the hub servicing was standard R&R like other bolt on sealed hubs (3-bolts anchored into the upright). From what I researched & learned, their lower anchor point is different. I'm guessing it's related to the lower BJ retention hardware occupying the same playground space so the spindle is machined accordingly @ that position & the hardware is different vs a standard app's hub.Not knowing their own products is the reason I bought these spindles in the first place- Brake/Bearing fitment is all over the place. CPP’s website lists C5/6/7 brakes will fit under the product image, then in the description states that only C5/6 stuff will work. But you read Summit’s description and it states ‘97-‘14! 2013 is C7 😂
I think we’re reaching a peak where no one knows why or how they’re doing the things their company or they themselves are doing when it comes to older cars, they’re just copying the people who came before them.
Yikes, that’s another reason to avoid those besides the price. For $1600+, you’d think the company would trust the end user to be able to maintain them.
True, but that requires R&D. They're more of a copy & paste re-brand establishment.I just don't get it. The CPPs are really close to being a perfect product. If they had just done a tad more R&D and made them taller and maybe moved the tie rod to correct bump steer, it would haven been an infinitely better product without costing much more than they do
GBodyForum is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com. Amazon, the Amazon logo, AmazonSupply, and the AmazonSupply logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.