Personally I think the 455 is the better choice. My posts above were just to try and point out a few pitfals.
I've built both and had both in two different street cars. Both cars had the same transmission and same rear gear.
My 455 was pretty much stock, no porting on the heads, no headers, etc.
It ran a best of 13.9@99mph before I pulled it out.
The 403 we built for my brother's '81 wasn't too radical either however it did have a larger camshaft, better intake, headers, and better flowing heads.
His has run a best of 13.2@101mph or so.
However the 455 engine I had was much more fun to drive on the street. I had a 2200 stall converter instead of the 3000 stall behind the 403 which makes a world of difference in the overal feel and streetabilty of the two engines.
I'd venture to say that if you did two builds, one was a 403 capable of 12 second ET's and a 455 capable of the same, the 455 would be a much more street friendly daily driver engine.
The two engines really didn't have that much different fuel economy either. 12-14mpg average.
I've built both and had both in two different street cars. Both cars had the same transmission and same rear gear.
My 455 was pretty much stock, no porting on the heads, no headers, etc.
It ran a best of 13.9@99mph before I pulled it out.
The 403 we built for my brother's '81 wasn't too radical either however it did have a larger camshaft, better intake, headers, and better flowing heads.
His has run a best of 13.2@101mph or so.
However the 455 engine I had was much more fun to drive on the street. I had a 2200 stall converter instead of the 3000 stall behind the 403 which makes a world of difference in the overal feel and streetabilty of the two engines.
I'd venture to say that if you did two builds, one was a 403 capable of 12 second ET's and a 455 capable of the same, the 455 would be a much more street friendly daily driver engine.
The two engines really didn't have that much different fuel economy either. 12-14mpg average.