So my dad leased a '15 Camry a few years back, and his lease is almost up. He wants to buy this time around as opposed to leasing again. As per usual, he put me in charge of car shopping for him.
Now when it comes to commuter cars, I'm a Toyota guy through and through, and I'm tempted to steer him in the direction of a Toyota again. However, the Hyundai Sonata and Kia Optima are both pretty nice looking vehicles, and they are both offering some really aggressive sales pricing.
Now here is my experience with Kia and Hyundai. My mom bought a brand new Kia Sedona in 2006, and it was terrible. It needed fuel injectors, engine wiring harness, PCM and a throttle body before 40,000 miles. At 65,000 the transmission went. All replaced under warranty. At 70,000, the front A-arms rusted out and could've killed someone. They were replaced under recall. At 93,000, the transmission went again, and we got rid of the car. It was also rusting apart at the seams by that point. That was in 2015, and my mom traded it on a new Subaru.
At the time my mom bought the Sedona, people were saying Kia and Hyundai were much better than they were 10 years before. People are still saying that today about Hyundai and Kia and I'm wondering if there is any truth to it before I consider them for my dad's next vehicle. I lurked around on a Kia website and there were still a lot of people in newer models who had major components being replaced under warranty at very low mileage. I'm very leery of Korean cars after the Sedona.
Any satisfied Kia or Hyundai owners?
Now when it comes to commuter cars, I'm a Toyota guy through and through, and I'm tempted to steer him in the direction of a Toyota again. However, the Hyundai Sonata and Kia Optima are both pretty nice looking vehicles, and they are both offering some really aggressive sales pricing.
Now here is my experience with Kia and Hyundai. My mom bought a brand new Kia Sedona in 2006, and it was terrible. It needed fuel injectors, engine wiring harness, PCM and a throttle body before 40,000 miles. At 65,000 the transmission went. All replaced under warranty. At 70,000, the front A-arms rusted out and could've killed someone. They were replaced under recall. At 93,000, the transmission went again, and we got rid of the car. It was also rusting apart at the seams by that point. That was in 2015, and my mom traded it on a new Subaru.
At the time my mom bought the Sedona, people were saying Kia and Hyundai were much better than they were 10 years before. People are still saying that today about Hyundai and Kia and I'm wondering if there is any truth to it before I consider them for my dad's next vehicle. I lurked around on a Kia website and there were still a lot of people in newer models who had major components being replaced under warranty at very low mileage. I'm very leery of Korean cars after the Sedona.
Any satisfied Kia or Hyundai owners?