Rear coilovers - Ridetech vs Spohn

Status
Not open for further replies.

Captain Calais

Not-quite-so-new-guy
Oct 26, 2009
25
0
8
Hey guys,

Just wondering if anyone has any suggestions on a rear coilover brand. I was looking at Ridetech and Spohn, and only saw a few differences; mounting location hardware and price ($850 for Ridetech compared to $580 for the Spohn).

The Spohn are based off of QA1 coilover shocks, which is a pretty good brand in itself. So why the huge difference in price?? Is there something about the Ridetech setup that is $290 better? Or is Ridetech on crack trying to charge that much?
 
Well I gave them both a look and I couldn't come up with anything decisive. I was surprised they were both "Bolt-on." It looks like the QA1s mount much like the stock shock. The ones from Ridetech look as if they mount at a slightly different angle (but only slightly). What I'm really focused on is the shock mounts themselves. The QA1s are basically putting the force of the shock and the spring on the stock upper shock mounts, but the ones from Ridetech use a plate for a top mount instead of a t-bar. It looks like it might spread the load out on the top shock mount a little more, making it a little more sturdy. But there again, you could get double adjustables from Spohn for less than the price of single adjustables from Ridetech and then just find your own way to reinforce the top shock mount. That's what I'd do, unless someone has something to add..
 
307 Regal said:
Well I gave them both a look and I couldn't come up with anything decisive. I was surprised they were both "Bolt-on." It looks like the QA1s mount much like the stock shock. The ones from Ridetech look as if they mount at a slightly different angle (but only slightly). What I'm really focused on is the shock mounts themselves. The QA1s are basically putting the force of the shock and the spring on the stock upper shock mounts, but the ones from Ridetech use a plate for a top mount instead of a t-bar. It looks like it might spread the load out on the top shock mount a little more, making it a little more sturdy. But there again, you could get double adjustables from Spohn for less than the price of single adjustables from Ridetech and then just find your own way to reinforce the top shock mount. That's what I'd do, unless someone has something to add..

I believe http://www.umiperformance.com has just started carrying a brand called viking performance; http://www.umiperformance.com/catalog/i ... urers_id=7
I don't see rears listed yet but I am sure they will have them soon.

http://vi-king.com/
 
1983regal said:
307 Regal said:
Well I gave them both a look and I couldn't come up with anything decisive. I was surprised they were both "Bolt-on." It looks like the QA1s mount much like the stock shock. The ones from Ridetech look as if they mount at a slightly different angle (but only slightly). What I'm really focused on is the shock mounts themselves. The QA1s are basically putting the force of the shock and the spring on the stock upper shock mounts, but the ones from Ridetech use a plate for a top mount instead of a t-bar. It looks like it might spread the load out on the top shock mount a little more, making it a little more sturdy. But there again, you could get double adjustables from Spohn for less than the price of single adjustables from Ridetech and then just find your own way to reinforce the top shock mount. That's what I'd do, unless someone has something to add..

I believe http://www.umiperformance.com has just started carrying a brand called viking performance; http://www.umiperformance.com/catalog/i ... urers_id=7
I don't see rears listed yet but I am sure they will have them soon.

http://vi-king.com/

Yes, I actually bought Viking fronts when UMI had their last sale. Supposedly Viking only carries double adjustables to keep cost down. Since they weren't offering rear coil-overs yet, I just got Viking shocks and Hotchkis springs. None of this stuff is in my car yet.
 
I used the Ride-Tech ones. I threw away their lower bracket and just used a spacer to provide a little distance between the spring and axle tube and used a 1/2" grade 8 bolt to attach the lower eye of the shock to the stock mounting location.
 

Attachments

  • 8106520680_a90d04b3d2_z.jpg
    8106520680_a90d04b3d2_z.jpg
    280.1 KB · Views: 2,359
There is a diffrence.. between the two , Qa1's and Ridetechs...

Not saying one is better than the other.. but I know from experince of riding in a Pro-Touring G-body with shocks and Springs, and then in one with Ridetech's coilovers.

The diference is in the constuction, and quality, the QA1's , I belive are off shore manufactured, "dont quote me on it" and are many conponets designed to be a coilover kit, basicly it's a shock inside of a threaded tube with a upper spring seat kit to fit over the upper shock mounting area. and a lower coil spring plate that threads down the tube.
cok_100.jpg

ck1951v_-_coil-over_kit.jpg


with various springs availible to fit closely to weight and use of the vehicle. Again no reference where they are made.

They in their design work as intended as a coilover shock. and their inexpensive cost.

Ridetech's shock is a mono designed shock tube, it's a peice of flat billet aluminum puck, that is impact forged to 1 single tube, ineffect no seams to leak, and a stiffer stronger tube that's threaded and the valving rides inside that tube only, these are made here in Indiana, the springs are Hypercoil springs also made in Indiana , specificly designed for your car or even a street rod.
The spring company has been in business for years in various forms of racing, all the parts to assemble the coilspring are designed in house at Ridetech, made also by local shops.
The coil spring plate and lower adjuster do not have set screw to set them that tightens the screw to the surface of the tube, they have it designed to have a threaded hole thru the end mating surfaces to allow a bolt to go thru to tighten up and clamp the the threaded tube.

if you look more into the two, you will see the difference, and why the cost factor is different also.. in my opinion the ridetechs quality and craftsman ship will give you the better ride, knowing that the shocks control 90% of the cars ride quality and handling, its good to know that a product will deliver to its upmost standards and then some.

As for straight mounting from frame to axle with no mount is not a good idea, the mounts are made for two reasons , one being to pull the coilovers away from the brake drums for clearance if one should go to disc brakes in the rear and ve to clear the bigger calipers, number two is the angle of the coilover, it's that way to reduce stress on side loads of the coilover, thus giving it longevity, and also give better control to the compress and rebound of that tire, more direct.

Hope this helps
 
  • Like
Reactions: xylorex
Status
Not open for further replies.

GBodyForum is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com. Amazon, the Amazon logo, AmazonSupply, and the AmazonSupply logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.

Please support GBodyForum Sponsors

Classic Truck Consoles Dixie Restoration Depot UMI Performance

Contact [email protected] for info on becoming a sponsor