tetomas said:
You cant just change the module, you have to change the whole dist. The OEM one does not have a vacuum advance on it. Get a dist. and carb from a non-computer control engine this is the only way you will get it to run right.
I was telling him to keep the CCC Qjet and get a AC Delco replacement computer advance dist. CCC Qjets beat all the aftermarket junk carbs. Why people are so bent on removing the computer for no good reason is beyond me. Going to non CCC is a downgrade, not an upgrade, worse MPGs with no gain in performance and sometimes a drop in it plus the cost of the conversion. Money would be better spent on better heads, or a better cam and headers. My car runs excellently with the CCC, very easy to work on system and simple, read my sig. GM 7-pin modules have a higher current limit & use adaptive dwell from the ECM unlike the older 4 pin modules.
Also badlad, your carb would have gone into full rich, cylinder washing mode with zero spark advance, must have been a real fun to drive

. Most likely you had a bad vacuum leak leaning out your mixture, with the CCC disabled and the carb defaulted to full rich, it would mask the lean problem, not really fixing it.
Papa, if you really must have a performance dist, here is a list of computer advance versions.
http://www.summitracing.com/search?keyword=HEI Distributor computer advance&dds=1 You can advance the base timing some, but you can't change the advance curve without burning a new PROM chip or using the rare Crane Cams aftermarket adjustable ECM. All US cars 1981 and newer are computer controlled, 1980 was the last year you could buy a non computer car in this country except CA, they were already all computer in 80.