My 2+2 is more "aerodynamic" than a new Z06/Z07 corvette. At 165 mph I'm using at least 150 less HP than one because it has 650 Hp and I have 500Hp and our distance from a standing start to 165 mph (a little more than a mile) is roughly the same, yet its still rated at 23mpg highway(with 650 HP) - because it has torque and can pull a high gear. All of the downforce the Z06/Z07 generates comes at huge aero cost. The new ZR1 should be even more draggy... way more draggy than any G-body. Low and looking fast doesn't always translate into "low drag".
Having a motor with torque that can pull a high gear is key to fuel efficiency above all else. It's why Diesels get good mileage.
My 5.9 cummins quad cab got 20+ mpg on the highway @ 70 mph and it was a 6,500lb, tall, wide brick with a huge motor, because it had torque and could pull a high gear.
The little Ecotech 2.0L turbo's could probably knock down 30mph and would be fun in a light weight A/G body.
Having a motor with torque that can pull a high gear is key to fuel efficiency above all else. It's why Diesels get good mileage.
My 5.9 cummins quad cab got 20+ mpg on the highway @ 70 mph and it was a 6,500lb, tall, wide brick with a huge motor, because it had torque and could pull a high gear.
The little Ecotech 2.0L turbo's could probably knock down 30mph and would be fun in a light weight A/G body.