85 Cutlass Brougham said:I'll also add that the 3rd and 4th generation F bodies were great "Driver's cars". Because of their great handling and acceleration? Naah. It's just that the driver was the only person who could be comfortable in the car! I mean, most companies succeed in making sporty coupes that have uncomfortable back seats. Only GM could make one that has an uncomfortable front passenger's seat as well. Whoever designed that floor pan hump was a genius. It ensured that the car would never be used for car pooling since no one wants to be a passenger in a F body!
Hahahahaha I just dont like the lack of logic used in the design of the car.
Its unibody, with a rear suspension that makes transmission swaps to anything but a camaro trans, more work then its worth.
Its just a total fail in my eyes.
I don't see what is so wrong with a good frame?
I dunno camaros after the 2nd gens are as dissapointing to me as GM bringing back the monte carlo as a bubble car with fwd and a 6 cyl.
it makes me as mad as nascar putting a FWD car body on a RWD chassis.
Anyways hahahah lets get back on topic. Nice to knwo we share some common thoughts 😀
I Love this site more and more .