Potentially. 2.41 may get worse mileage than say a 3.08. Around town at least. Itd be marginal at best. Few mpg.Rear gear choice may be a big factor in the difference.
Potentially. 2.41 may get worse mileage than say a 3.08. Around town at least. Itd be marginal at best. Few mpg.Rear gear choice may be a big factor in the difference.
The 3.8 wont get 18mpg without fuel injection.
Buick 350s are in basically every Buick from 1968-1980. And some jeeps from 68-71. The 68 and 69 oil through the rocker shafts (like a mopar 360, among others), and use solid pushrods so they need converted to 70+ pushrod oiling. 75-80 had HEI and stronger rods. Look around on Craigslist, facebook marketplace, etc for people parting out 70s Buicks. Demo guys use em a lot. Afaik a 455 Buick would require moving and welding the frame side mounts. Not hard if you can weld.
The 350 Buick uses all the same hookups, warer pump, timing cover (depending on year, older 3.8 covers have the pan bolt holes in right location), front end gaskets, starter, oil pump (same cover setup), etc. A 3.8 is literally a 350 minus cylinders 3 and 4, with a shorter stroke and deck height.
Neat. Guess the 3.8s I've owned/rode in needed a tuneup.In 1980 Motor Trend tested a 1980 Century Limited sedan with a 231 engine and recorded 19.8 mpg on their 73 mile test loop. Federal EPA rating was 20 mpg. Car was new and engine was not broken in.
I have not forgot about you Greg. I should be buying a load of lumber next week. Usually a week or two out. I will contact the driver and find out if he is heading back west.
timo22
GBodyForum is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com. Amazon, the Amazon logo, AmazonSupply, and the AmazonSupply logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.