Is your G-body "Old School" or "Restomod"?

Is your G-body "Old School" or "Restomod"?

  • "Old School"

    Votes: 34 59.6%
  • "Restomod"

    Votes: 23 40.4%

  • Total voters
    57
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Definitely restomod all day long. If it doesn't make it go faster, stop better, or turn mo' betta, I ain't interested. However, I do like it to look stockish.

I agree 100%.

The only thing I want old about my cars is the body.

If I had to start over, my first purchase would have been a 4l80e, then a new rear end, then an LS motor swap. Followed by suspension, steering and brakes.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: 307 Regal
I don't believe in labels.

That being said I would argue that our wagon is more of a classic recipe than a "Restomod" (thanks for that over used term, Barrett J-ck-ff - barf!) and here is why:

The restomod ideals tend to be based around sticking late-model parts under cars. Meaning all of the factory running gear (engine, trans, IRS/rearend) is plucked from donor and shoehorned into an old car. Stock for stock - gain all of the late model reliability with no personality. Jam some brakes and wheels on there, and off to sitting around a parade ground with your crying baby on the bumper you go. Looks stock and pushes no boundaries. Restomodding a car is as boring and mundane as it comes.

In contrast there is doing a performance build with late-model parts. The cam in our wagon is about as aggressive as you can get without having major driveability problems - the LSA and overlap really contribute to the sound and experience; add ported heads, long tubes, etc and you have a high strung V8 that rumbles. The trans is worked over with a "shift kit" and no torque/shift/TCC management or PWM to soften the gear changes - when the TCC comes on it is like a kick in the back; plus it has a decent sized stall converter. The rearend is a Dana 60 - like a HEMI car - with 3.73s. Stupid fat tires for looks, and bigger brakes for safety. It runs and drives like a vintage muscle car (it even stalls sometimes) and is a visceral experience from the moment you see it.

But, you are also talking to a man who has been banned from Pro-touring.com because of opinions such as these - so take it with a grain of salt.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't believe in labels. (<-- They get thrown around far too often)
But, you are also talking to a man who has been banned from Pro-touring.com because of opinions such as these - so take it with a grain of salt.
I've seen some of your pro-touring posts years ago. I'm not surprised. 😀
 
Yep....I've had it since i was 17 back in 2001. The transformation over the years. Here is a pic back before the resto began.View attachment 68783
I wish I still had my 83 my cousin crushed it if I remember right when it got crushed it had no motor and transmission but was a roller set up for SBC it had headers full 2.5 dual exhaust and a 7.5 3.23 posi and a rebuilt front end and rear suspension boxed arms and drag bags I think it had no hops in it to oh well it's gone now
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

GBodyForum is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com. Amazon, the Amazon logo, AmazonSupply, and the AmazonSupply logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.

Please support GBodyForum Sponsors

Classic Truck Consoles Dixie Restoration Depot UMI Performance

Contact [email protected] for info on becoming a sponsor