I don't believe in labels.
That being said I would argue that our wagon is more of a classic recipe than a "Restomod" (thanks for that over used term, Barrett J-ck-ff - barf!) and here is why:
The restomod ideals tend to be based around sticking late-model parts under cars. Meaning all of the factory running gear (engine, trans, IRS/rearend) is plucked from donor and shoehorned into an old car. Stock for stock - gain all of the late model reliability with no personality. Jam some brakes and wheels on there, and off to sitting around a parade ground with your crying baby on the bumper you go. Looks stock and pushes no boundaries. Restomodding a car is as boring and mundane as it comes.
In contrast there is doing a performance build with late-model parts. The cam in our wagon is about as aggressive as you can get without having major driveability problems - the LSA and overlap really contribute to the sound and experience; add ported heads, long tubes, etc and you have a high strung V8 that rumbles. The trans is worked over with a "shift kit" and no torque/shift/TCC management or PWM to soften the gear changes - when the TCC comes on it is like a kick in the back; plus it has a decent sized stall converter. The rearend is a Dana 60 - like a HEMI car - with 3.73s. Stupid fat tires for looks, and bigger brakes for safety. It runs and drives like a vintage muscle car (it even stalls sometimes) and is a visceral experience from the moment you see it.
But, you are also talking to a man who has been banned from Pro-touring.com because of opinions such as these - so take it with a grain of salt.