More power

Status
Not open for further replies.

spidereyes455

G-Body Guru
Mar 6, 2013
797
1,666
93
Northeastern PA
X3 on too much carb, you might be able to get away with a 750 vac. secondary carb but the puddle dumper is too much. I also think you need more stall with that cam probly around 2500 at least. And in my opinion the comp ratio may be on the low side for a cam with that much duration at 50 thou. about 10 or 10.5 would be better unless it has a wide lobe seperation. Headers and a GOOD properly sized exhaust is also a must along with proper gearing I'd shoot for 3.42 at a minimum though 3.73's would be better. It's all about how the package as a whole works together, not just nessiaraly bolting on shiny hi-po parts that are recommended in a magazine and expecting 600hp.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: 2 users

Quilly Cochran

Not-quite-so-new-guy
Jan 16, 2017
11
0
1
X3 on too much carb, you might be able to get away with a 750 vac. secondary carb but the puddle dumper is too much. I also think you need more stall with that cam probly around 2500 at least. And in my opinion the comp ratio may be on the low side for a cam with that much duration at 50 thou. about 10 or 10.5 would be better unless it has a wide lobe seperation. Headers and a GOOD properly sized exhaust is also a must along with proper gearing I'd shoot for 3.42 at a minimum though 3.73's would be better. It's all about how the package as a whole works together, not just nessiaraly bolting on shiny hi-po parts that are recommended in a magazine and expecting 600hp.
I was thinking bigger stall too I got that one cause that’s what I could afford at that time
 

lilbowtie

Comic Book Super Hero
Jan 7, 2006
3,460
3,965
113
Canton Mi
With the HP you want that 7.5 is a weak link - your stall needs to complement the cam/rear
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

bob64

G-Body Guru
Mar 30, 2017
713
678
93
Niagara Falls, Canada
What brand intake? I agree you need more cam which then you could use a higher stall. Your carbs alittle big but for a screaming sbc(8000rpm plus) it works.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users

Michael Watts

Master Mechanic
Dec 12, 2017
418
201
43
Bigger isn`t always better .Everything has to match up. And 3310 750 Holley is probably more street-able Than a double pumper.And will get better gas mileage as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users

bracketchev1221

Royal Smart Person
Jan 18, 2018
1,430
1,680
113
What does the car do now? Is it spinning the tires? Where does the car feel sluggish? Fuel pump is not going to do anything if the car is not falling flat over 5000. Ignition is not going to help it unless the car is breaking up and misfiring. 750 carburetor may be on the large side, but I doubt it will help anything with a vacuum secondary carburetor other than cruising efficiency. The carburetors both have the same size butterflies in them, so throttle response won't change. Is the car getting full throttle right now, what air cleaner assembly is on it, what is the timing set at?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

lilbowtie

Comic Book Super Hero
Jan 7, 2006
3,460
3,965
113
Canton Mi
Sounds like you have a nice set-up for the street, don't know why you want to mess with it. The covertor you have will work with your cam - racing I would want more. That fuel pump isn't going to improve performance and tuning your car with a wide band would insure your set up for best performance. I would send that distributor back, it isn't going to help you but hurt you on the street. Don't expect more performance from the MSD box either. Take a little time and read this article



TIMING AND VACUUM ADVANCE 101

The most important concept to understand is that lean mixtures, such as at idle and steady highway cruise, take longer to burn than rich mixtures; idle in particular, as idle mixture is affected by exhaust gas dilution. This requires that lean mixtures have "the fire lit" earlier in the compression cycle (spark timing advanced), allowing more burn time so that peak cylinder pressure is reached just after TDC for peak efficiency and reduced exhaust gas temperature (wasted combustion energy). Rich mixtures, on the other hand, burn faster than lean mixtures, so they need to have "the fire lit" later in the compression cycle (spark timing retarded slightly) so maximum cylinder pressure is still achieved at the same point after TDC as with the lean mixture, for maximum efficiency.

The centrifugal advance system in a distributor advances spark timing purely as a function of engine rpm (irrespective of engine load or operating conditions), with the amount of advance and the rate at which it comes in determined by the weights and springs on top of the autocam mechanism. The amount of advance added by the distributor, combined with initial static timing, is "total timing" (i.e., the 34-36 degrees at high rpm that most SBC's like). Vacuum advance has absolutely nothing to do with total timing or performance, as when the throttle is opened, manifold vacuum drops essentially to zero, and the vacuum advance drops out entirely; it has no part in the "total timing" equation.

At idle, the engine needs additional spark advance in order to fire that lean, diluted mixture earlier in order to develop maximum cylinder pressure at the proper point, so the vacuum advance can (connected to manifold vacuum, not "ported" vacuum - more on that aberration later) is activated by the high manifold vacuum, and adds about 15 degrees of spark advance, on top of the initial static timing setting (i.e., if your static timing is at 10 degrees, at idle it's actually around 25 degrees with the vacuum advance connected). The same thing occurs at steady-state highway cruise; the mixture is lean, takes longer to burn, the load on the engine is low, the manifold vacuum is high, so the vacuum advance is again deployed, and if you had a timing light set up so you could see the balancer as you were going down the highway, you'd see about 50 degrees advance (10 degrees initial, 20-25 degrees from the centrifugal advance, and 15 degrees from the vacuum advance) at steady-state cruise (it only takes about 40 horsepower to cruise at 50mph).

When you accelerate, the mixture is instantly enriched (by the accelerator pump, power valve, etc.), burns faster, doesn't need the additional spark advance, and when the throttle plates open, manifold vacuum drops, and the vacuum advance can returns to zero, retarding the spark timing back to what is provided by the initial static timing plus the centrifugal advance provided by the distributor at that engine rpm; the vacuum advance doesn't come back into play until you back off the gas and manifold vacuum increases again as you return to steady-state cruise, when the mixture again becomes lean.

The key difference is that centrifugal advance (in the distributor autocam via weights and springs) is purely rpm-sensitive; nothing changes it except changes in rpm. Vacuum advance, on the other hand, responds to engine load and rapidly-changing operating conditions, providing the correct degree of spark advance at any point in time based on engine load, to deal with both lean and rich mixture conditions. By today's terms, this was a relatively crude mechanical system, but it did a good job of optimizing engine efficiency, throttle response, fuel economy, and idle cooling, with absolutely ZERO effect on wide-open throttle performance, as vacuum advance is inoperative under wide-open throttle conditions. In modern cars with computerized engine controllers, all those sensors and the controller change both mixture and spark timing 50 to 100 times per second, and we don't even HAVE a distributor any more - it's all electronic.

Now, to the widely-misunderstood manifold-vs.-ported vacuum aberration. After 30-40 years of controlling vacuum advance with full manifold vacuum, along came emissions requirements, years before catalytic converter technology had been developed, and all manner of crude band-aid systems were developed to try and reduce hydrocarbons and oxides of nitrogen in the exhaust stream. One of these band-aids was "ported spark", which moved the vacuum pickup orifice in the carburetor venturi from below the throttle plate (where it was exposed to full manifold vacuum at idle) to above the throttle plate, where it saw no manifold vacuum at all at idle. This meant the vacuum advance was inoperative at idle (retarding spark timing from its optimum value), and these applications also had VERY low initial static timing (usually 4 degrees or less, and some actually were set at 2 degrees AFTER TDC). This was done in order to increase exhaust gas temperature (due to "lighting the fire late") to improve the effectiveness of the "afterburning" of hydrocarbons by the air injected into the exhaust manifolds by the A.I.R. system; as a result, these engines ran like crap, and an enormous amount of wasted heat energy was transferred through the exhaust port walls into the coolant, causing them to run hot at idle - cylinder pressure fell off, engine temperatures went up, combustion efficiency went down the drain, and fuel economy went down with it.

If you look at the centrifugal advance calibrations for these "ported spark, late-timed" engines, you'll see that instead of having 20 degrees of advance, they had up to 34 degrees of advance in the distributor, in order to get back to the 34-36 degrees "total timing" at high rpm wide-open throttle to get some of the performance back. The vacuum advance still worked at steady-state highway cruise (lean mixture = low emissions), but it was inoperative at idle, which caused all manner of problems - "ported vacuum" was strictly an early, pre-converter crude emissions strategy, and nothing more.

What about the Harry high-school non-vacuum advance polished billet "whizbang" distributors you see in the Summit and Jeg's catalogs? They're JUNK on a street-driven car, but some people keep buying them because they're "race car" parts, so they must be "good for my car" - they're NOT. "Race cars" run at wide-open throttle, rich mixture, full load, and high rpm all the time, so they don't need a system (vacuum advance) to deal with the full range of driving conditions encountered in street operation. Anyone driving a street-driven car without manifold-connected vacuum advance is sacrificing idle cooling, throttle response, engine efficiency, and fuel economy, probably because they don't understand what vacuum advance is, how it works, and what it's for - there are lots of long-time experienced "mechanics" who don't understand the principles and operation of vacuum advance either, so they're not alone.

Vacuum advance calibrations are different between stock engines and modified engines, especially if you have a lot of cam and have relatively low manifold vacuum at idle. Most stock vacuum advance cans aren’t fully-deployed until they see about 15” Hg. Manifold vacuum, so those cans don’t work very well on a modified engine; with less than 15” Hg. at a rough idle, the stock can will “dither” in and out in response to the rapidly-changing manifold vacuum, constantly varying the amount of vacuum advance, which creates an unstable idle. Modified engines with more cam that generate less than 15” Hg. of vacuum at idle need a vacuum advance can that’s fully-deployed at least 1”, preferably 2” of vacuum less than idle vacuum level so idle advance is solid and stable; the Echlin #VC-1810 advance can (about $10 at NAPA) provides the same amount of advance as the stock can (15 degrees), but is fully-deployed at only 8” of vacuum, so there is no variation in idle timing even with a stout cam.

For peak engine performance, driveability, idle cooling and efficiency in a street-driven car, you need vacuum advance, connected to full manifold vacuum. Absolutely. Positively. Don't ask Summit or Jeg's about it – they don’t understand it, they're on commission, and they want to sell "race car" parts.
 
  • Informative
  • Winner
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users

pontiacgp

blank
Mar 31, 2006
29,270
20,418
113
Kitchener, Ontario
If you think your carb isn't too big for your 355 the GM engineeers used a Holley 780 on the 1970 454 which was rated at 450 hp and 500 lb⋅ft of torque, the engine actually had over 500 hp but for insurance purposes GM underrated it. I'll put money on it that if you properly tune it you'll have more hp on a dymo with a 750 quadrajet or a 600 Holley than you will with your 750 Holley. This isn't my opinion, there is plenty of information on the power you loose with a carb that is too big. It is the size of the engine and the rpm you plan to run it at that tells you what size carb you need.

We used the 8551 distributor in our race cars cause all we do is run then at high rpm, on a street car you want the vacuum advance for acceleration from low rpm and fuel milage.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: 1 user

Michael Watts

Master Mechanic
Dec 12, 2017
418
201
43
a lot depends on what you want to do with the car. A dialed in Q jet will give you more low end because pg the spread bore design. That is why you see the torque type engines like Buick and Pontiac. I have had most luck with an HEI with a multi-spark bow like MSD or Crane.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: 1 user
Status
Not open for further replies.

GBodyForum is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com. Amazon, the Amazon logo, AmazonSupply, and the AmazonSupply logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.

Please support GBodyForum Sponsors

Classic Truck Consoles Dixie Restoration Depot UMI Performance

Contact [email protected] for info on becoming a sponsor