Yeah, it's a big loss, but it doesn't bother me that much. I'm fine using my clutch fan until I can get an electric setup I like.
I had that fan factory on my 70S, 350, non A/C with no shroud. Foxtrot on here used that one with his 403, it does move a lot of air. Interesting that it draws less power than some.they didn't rate this one but it's one that racers use and it takes less hp to spin it but it does move alot of air...
![]()
"Be careful, some stock engine driven fans can reach a blade stall at high rpm, causing a “wall” that prevents air from passing through it."
That fan does move lots of air!I had that fan factory on my 70S, 350, non A/C with no shroud. Foxtrot on here used that one with his 403, it does move a lot of air. Interesting that it draws less power than some.
For the record, the Car Craft comparison test I mentioned did test a rigid 4-blade fan like this one. The result? 473.0 HP output, or 21.4 HP less than the electric fan setup.
For anyone who wants to read the test for themselves, I found a .pdf of the entire issue here:
http://seads.net/performance/images/CarCraft/Car Craft May 2000.pdf
UNGN - Just curious if you ever tried running w/o a fan for your type of racing? I know the electric fan is probably being driven at your speeds. Also does anyone run methanol? I know the big disadvantage would be how much you would have to carry. Would love to ride shot gun on one of those passes.
GBodyForum is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com. Amazon, the Amazon logo, AmazonSupply, and the AmazonSupply logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.