holley vs q-jet

which do you think is the best overall carb?

  • q-jet

    Votes: 126 55.8%
  • holley

    Votes: 71 31.4%
  • edelbrock

    Votes: 17 7.5%
  • demon/barry grant

    Votes: 9 4.0%
  • carter

    Votes: 3 1.3%

  • Total voters
    226
Strictly stickng to the catagories listed in OP here's the breakdown as I see it:

Fuel Mileage: Q-Jet, you'll never be able to beat a spread bore on cruising fuel mileage. Wide open fuel mileage however, I'll leave that to the circle track guys to care about.

Power: Holley, Both the Q-jet and Holley can be altered to create very good flow characteristics, but you eventually hit a wall with the spread bore and fuel distribution, atomization, and turbulance. A wall that you dont get with a square bore.

Ease of Use/Tuning: Holley, not only are holley's easy to tune via 4 corner idle screws vs the Q-jet's 2, but they also have a double pumper configuration which is more appropriate for some applications vs a vac secondary which is Q-jet's only configuration. Interchangable pump cams, screw in air bleeds, etc all give the holley the advantage in tuning. The Q-jet also suffers from a severe lack of aftermarket parts, wich the Holley does not.

I'd also like to add the Holley is infinately better looking than the Q-jet, which looks very utilitarian and gruff.

As you can guess, by my avitar, I picked Holley, for all the reasons mentioned above.

I do believe Q-jets have a very good roll to play on street cars, but street cars is about the extent of their domain.

If anything I said about the Q-jet is wrong, I appolagize, I do not work with them much except to repair the few that are on friends cars.
 
I am a long time Eddy fan, as I have posted previously. On a lark, I bought a Summit carburetor (600cfm electric choke) when I needed a carb for my sister's suburban. So, I put the eddy on her truck....a known quantity.....and put the summit carb on my cutlass as an experiment.

The car idles better, and more importantly has more pop out of the hole AND better throttle response. I am surprised. I may have found a new favorite carb. The only adjustment I have made so far was turning the air bleed screws out about 1/3 of a turn each side.

Just decided to throw that out there to further muddy the waters.

sb
 
I voted qjet. That would be for just about any engine out there.


It depends on the application, I'm trying to find a 390 cfm double pumper without choke/horn. Going to run a separate injector system along with the holley and a centrifugal s/c. A qjet in this scenario could not work nearly as well no matter how well it was tuned.
 
HOLLEY for don't like the Quadra bogggs only the marine ones with less vac lines for the tunnel ram
 
1. Q-jet
2. Edelbrock/Carter
3. Holley

There's no beating the drivability and sound of the secondaries opening on a spread bore. I've owned nothing but GM cars my whole life so I'm partial to Q-jets.

The Edelbrock squarebore has to be the easiest carb on earth to rebuild and it's a simple design. I've had good luck with new ones, but also funny-acting used ones too.

My only experience with a Holley was a new 600 vac sec on a Chevy 400 nearly 20 years ago. I absolutely hated that carb. I either had to lean it out to run good on the low end, or richen it up to run right at higher speeds. I never found a sweet spot with that carb. Maybe it's not a fair assessment having only owned one, but sometimes that's all it takes to ruin the experience for someone.
 
I have a Carter Quadrajet carb that I bought for a spare but it's up for sale...Carter made Quadrajet carbs up until 79 I think
 
Man I always thought Holley's were the sh*t... But the 750DP on my car is very unpredictable it runs different every time I start the car, some days its boggy some days it has perfect throttle response. This is making me think I should try a Quadrajet, I know a guy that claims himself to be a quadrajet guru and he said he'd rebuild one for me. Maybe I should try it out. :shock:
 
you should try it out, you'll like the better gas mileage and better performance every day... 😀
 
Probably... I don't want to lose the top end, but the car could use more part throttle and off idle performance. And you're right, I haven't gotten to drive the car enough to see what kind of mileage it gets but judging by the amount of fuel it dumps when you open the butterflies looking down the barrels it's sickening. :lol:
 

GBodyForum is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com. Amazon, the Amazon logo, AmazonSupply, and the AmazonSupply logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.

Please support GBodyForum Sponsors

Classic Truck Consoles Dixie Restoration Depot UMI Performance

Contact [email protected] for info on becoming a sponsor