Always the biggest, steepest, gnarliest one. If you're gonna die, make it worth it.Choose which hill you want to die on.
I've seen this posted many, many places of late, and, it contains some grey area assertions and misleading information.
I believe that you are getting at comes down to the fact that alterations/amendments were made when the clean air act was reauthorized in 1990 by congress.
Following those changes, the EPA issued a formal statement related to rules promulgation in 1991.
View attachment 187189
Our cars predate the 1990 amendments and clarifications the EPA says, and quote, "individuals are now prohibited from tampering" under the answer to question 8. That language in and of itself clearly implies there was no prohibition explicit previously from an enforcement standpoint.
In fact, it was one of the amendments in Nov 1990 that for the first time prohibited tampering by private individuals. (See letter intro)
View attachment 187190
What does that tell me? Well, aside from state specific laws to the contrary, as long as the parts present either lack any part number (custom headers, or, pipes off cast factory manifolds) or are date stamped before 1990, is there anything to say it hasn't been there / they wouldn't be able to prove it hadn't been there since before the amendment, and done by some private individual before that date.
That doesn't help you with any newfangled plastic garbage cars, but, your gbody is a different story.
Remember, innocent until proven guilty. I'd also think that any modifications that could be grandfathered in as existing before 1990, and, before a state statute stricter than the federal one re: private party modifications was enacted, should prevail in a injunction against state action/repair demands.
Remember, trials are about evidence. If the state didn't have a strict statute on-books when the car was new, and, you can get ahold of an affidavit from an owner stating there was dual exhaust or no cat before 1991/state statute, whichever was first, you have evidence. Doesn't have to state WHO made the change, just that it was there. Then you have evidence. Burden shifts to the state to have evidence to show the modification didn't exist that far back in time, OR, that the non-conforming area had been repaired since 1991/the statute. My guess is they would have no such evidence.
From a practical standpoint, I doubt anyone in my state has ever had to "fight a mountain of legal entanglements" over removing a cat or adding dual exhaust......California is obviously on the other end of the spectrum..... How the OP decides to proceed is highly dependent on what state he lives in.My main point still stands that keeping the stock exhaust setup is alot easier than fighting a mountain of legal entanglements which is part of the law's design. It also still holds true that it is illegal to install a dual exhaust or delete the cat converter in a Gbody today.
I doubt most of the more advanced modern cats are designed to be used with carburetors or flat tappet motors. Big thing is every engine configuration since the 70's has a government certified low emission package. Either the EPA or CARB tests the vehicle to see if it meets their regulations they have set tor that year.I'll ask this, why would in this day & age, how could installing a cat that matched the O.E. performance would be cleaner when there are newer cats that do a better job being used as a single or dual set up? On top of that how may old school shops are there that can even bend the proper Y-pipe needed as not all shops may have the bend cards to make even a basic section of our pipes. Or even have a tech who can free hand the bends. The newest A/G is 34 years old & not all needed parts are out there to including smog parts. I have cobbled together a smog pump set up to satisfy the visable inspection as I can't find everything for the different SBC set ups. I have true duals with dual cats for this rebuild & had it like that on the last set up. Never caught flak from any inspection station. It's hot rodding, most mods we do is "illegal" in some form somewhere. Make it safe, cleaner, better & more fun than original. Unless it's a rat rod, then just make it run.
Like Poland or Bosnia?If he lives in a non-communist state, he will be fine.
Nah......more like Alabama or Montana.Like Poland or Bosnia?
GBodyForum is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com. Amazon, the Amazon logo, AmazonSupply, and the AmazonSupply logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.