I would like to see the ridge down the middle eliminated or the hood more closely designed to look more like the FE3X Oldsmobile engineered hood rather than Chevrolet.
But in the end It's a nice hood, I commend GOODMARK for their development efforts.
I would like to see more products offered by GOODMARK for the G-body community.
There are about 80 tools that were created over the last 3 years of my doing the project so there are plenty to keep the car from being scorned at because of the lack of parts. It is a good start.
Especially lightweight aluminum weight savings products such as hoods and decklids
Alum products are too expensive to create since they take a different tool than steel. Brian at Gbody is trying to get the cowl hood mfg to make the deck lid
and rust repair products such as inner rocker panels
They have been available and out for those to buy for 6 months now
and fenders or collision products such as urethane bumper covers, header panels
Fenders may be a possibllity not now. Urethane bumper covers are an issue. I tested the Monte Carlo SS cover with a factory and the result was not good. If the market would accept modern day materials we could make flexible bumper cover style covers, but they would not be urethane. More of a TPO material
and bumpers.
Bumpers have been out for quite some time now, as well as bumperettes. Bumpers in black and chrome are readily available.
It would also be nice to see Cutlass console buckets and dash .
Too expensive to make them correct, rather not make something that is not right. Dash is 575,000$ tooling cost.
Not trying to start something here, just commenting on what's already been said and implied as far as Toby as a Goodmark rep...
I too find it very odd... I've never seen another rep for any company conduct themselves as he has regarding the line between their job and their personal life.
I am not a rep, I am a product development manager. I do not pay to advertise here, I usually do not even promote anything about the family of products I develop. I was given all the product developed and was tested on my car on my time. So this is where you get the "ownership" of the product, because honestly....I did do a crazy amount of it, alone with Brian at Gbodyparts.
It's cool that Toby likes what he's developing and gets into the products more than any other typical rep would but people get confused as to whom is doing what... he seems to be taking the credit for Goodmarks accomplishments and not presenting the name Goodmark as often as he should or conducting himself professionally enough as a representative of the company.
i am quite passionate. I am quite experienced on why the aftermaket has received such a terrible reputation and we, I whomever always hear the chinese junk crap in threads all the time. I just had enough of the crap.
Heck, the comments made in this thread would deem most company reps terminated from their position with their company since it potentially represents the company's opinions and views.
My supervisors are constantly sent these posts, and the mfg are constantly reading the peoples feedback about the product. I have no fear about putting out there what I have honestly done, because it is the truth and they understand it, know about it, see peoples feedback about overseas product and could care less about me sticking up for the line.
Like 90% of the corporations out there the decision to proceed with this market is made by the directors..
The decision to proceed with this line and the direction it took was up to me with approval from mgmt. After that, it was all my responsibility to make sure it was created, priced, and brought to market correctly at a fair price with a top notch quality factor.
I bet they could hand this project to someone else who gave to sh*ts about G-body's and the same products would result due to the market and financial research done.
Incorrect, anyone can make products for cars, and the product would be crap. I took my experience of the past 15 years being in the aftermarket and coupled the car I was needing parts for (the 81 cutlass) and used it as building blocks to see first hand what a person might need in a restore. As I continued I saw that I needed a car in worse shape, so I purchased the 85 442 which was purposely purchased rotted all to hell to see what is needed first hand, and to make the repairs of the prototype panels as true testament of the product working well years to come. I cannot say that others would have done what i did. You can be rest assured, all the parts that are out there went through two anal persons opinions before they came to market...Brian Weaver and me. I am not going to diss other distributors out there...But I know first hand that there is alot of product coming out for the 78-81 transam that is going to be junk from the practice this company is using to make the products.
a.. They are using used damaged parts to reverse engineer
b. No car on land to compare to for test fit 1
c. I know the company 😉
Also. when I develop a life saving medical device as a product development engineer I don't go publically into the marketplace and make it my own or brag about it being my accomplishment or THREATEN TO SUE PEOPLE with my company's lawyers and censor them if they criticize the product/company (especially after asking for criticism) or myself and my own personal private sales.
THis is a passion, and it was part of my career. It is different and I do not see medical devices as hobby toys for grown ups.