Oh, hey dudes, I should have put "rhetorical question" on my previous post. I'm not actually stressing over this decision.
Just seems like it
Had I not completely by accident run across that 2013 SL550, like 30K miles, for less than $40K I wouldn't have bothered to even share. Then an XK Jag with only 10K on the clock and that nearly perfect SL above for just over $40K with my name on the MMI display and thought that was funny. Then I saw a [$155K new] AMG, granted 2009 model, but only 16K miles can also be had for $40K and I had to take a WTF time out.
The only bad thing about like that 67 above is "my need" is to have a car nice enough to take on a long cruise if I feel up to it but not too nice that I cannot like drive it to the doctor, grocery, drug, or box store [unlike my 442 when I get it back together]. It only goes where I can keep my eye on it. That 67 above is a clone car so . . . not a real 442 but, other than that, the thing is nice enough it practically belongs in Daryl Starbird's lineup [almost]. That previous 72 Cutlass S was the perfect car for the need but after nearly getting it bought for $30K, the dude now wants $37K for it.
Like I said before . . . I suck at this!
So, got off on a bend of buying like a low mileage Benz or something similar someone else has eaten the overwhelming majority of the depreciation on? 30K mile [$125K new] SL550s can be had for less than $40K already depreciated by 2/3, 50K mile SL550s are still selling for $25K which is only ~ 1/3 from 40K so the curve does get better and I wouldn't drive it more than 2000-3000 miles per year. The only unknown is "if it breaks and what breaks?"
Just talking cars and e-thinking out loud as usual!
😵