What would cars be like?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I dunno, trucks have gotten more and more luxurious over the years. I hadn't considered them filling the role of a Caprice or something bigger.
What is the least common truck that is on the road nowdays? A regular cab 8 foot bed! SUVs and crew cabs based on the full size platform have replaced the Caprices, Coupe de Ville and the rest
 
  • Like
Reactions: fleming442
forget the big cars, now many have transplanted their butts to full size pickups and full size SUV's.. :popcorn:
Don't you mean "oversized pickups and SUV"s"? My feeling is that C10, C20, F100, F150, F250's of the 70's and early 80's were what a full size was supposed to be. Today's full size makes them look small.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: pagrunt
They all grew in size:

7,w=993,q=high,c=0.bild.jpg


You'll see the same parking a '70 Challenger next to a 2020 one or any F-Body GM model then and now.
Even the 2nd Gen 2500 RAM I used to drive was small against a new one and that was the biggest you want to drive on European roads.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fleming442
They all grew in size:

7,w=993,q=high,c=0.bild.jpg


You'll see the same parking a '70 Challenger next to a 2020 one or any F-Body GM model then and now.
Even the 2nd Gen 2500 RAM I used to drive was small against a new one and that was the biggest you want to drive on European roads.

They had to get bigger, because they got more powerful - because everything around them did the same. It was to avoid dying.

I am pleased with the way things turned out. The original muscle cars were relative turds by comparison to what we have today.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fleming442
They had to get bigger, because they got more powerful - because everything around them did the same. It was to avoid dying.

I am pleased with the way things turned out. The original muscle cars were relative turds by comparison to what we have today.

I never thought a turd could be so appealing...😊

622133.jpg
 
SPECIFICATIONS
Engine
400.0-cu-in/6554cc OHV V-8, 1x4-bbl Rochester Quadrajet carburetor
Power and torque (SAE gross) 360 hp @ 5100 rpm, 438 lb-ft @ 3600 rpm
Drivetrain 4-speed manual RWD
Brakes front: vented disc, rear: finned drum
Suspension front: control arms, coil springs, anti-roll bar; rear: live axle, coil springs
Dimensions L: 206.6 in, W: 74.4 in, H: 55.0 in
Weight 3650 lb
Performance 0-60 mph: 4.9 sec, quarter mile: 14.21 sec @ 102.97 mph, 60-0 mph: 186 ft (Motor Trend, January 1967, test car equipped with Royal Pontiac Bobcat kit)
Price when new "No purchase necessary to win" ($3764.19)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

GBodyForum is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com. Amazon, the Amazon logo, AmazonSupply, and the AmazonSupply logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.

Please support GBodyForum Sponsors

Classic Truck Consoles Dixie Restoration Depot UMI Performance

Contact [email protected] for info on becoming a sponsor