What's your dream custom vehicle?

Status
Not open for further replies.

MrSony

Geezer
Nov 15, 2014
6,831
6,741
113
Des Moines, Iowa
Oh I see. I thought you meant you already had a 500hp Buick 350... Yeah I would think building a Buick 350 would cost a fortune! You can build a 400hp 350 SBC for pretty cheap with junkyard Vortec iron heads. The heads is where everything gets expensive. With a Buick 350, what would the best cylinder heads be that aren't aftermarket? There never really was a "high performance" Buick 350 was there? So would the pre-smog heads be the best?
I guess the pre smog heads were better, but the 350 was a smog era engine. It was made from 68-80, and really only had a single year of good performance in the 70 GS Skylarks. 315hp, 400torque. There are really 3 types of factory iron heads, the 68 and 69 heads that oiled through the rocker shafts and will NOT interchange with 70-80 engines without serious mods (the blocks as well), the early 70s non smog era heads, and the early-mid 70s to 80 smog heads. In 1979 they had slightly larger exhaust valves. They are a well designed head on paper, but in practice they are lacking in stock form. Porting on the exhaust side helps them out a lot. All of them had anywhere from 50-58cc chambers. Large open chamber design, no quench area to speak of. Buick changed compression with pistons rather than designing a whole new head, a good move IMO. All things the same, take an 8:1 motor (closer to around 7.8) and swap in "10:1" pistons with the 10cc dish rather than the ~24, and you'll be around 9:1. TA has new closed chamber (heart shaped) heads in the works, but they are north of 2k. But they are a serious leg up on even maxed out iron heads, plus they are a bolt on thing. Can even use factory shaft rocker setup and valve covers. To actually answer your question, the best heads are whatever you can get your hands on. They are all the same for the most part, aside form the 68-69s as I mentioned. Aside from water passage differences between the 70-73/4 engines and the 75-80 engines, I think those heads are the same. Flow and valve wise, no real discernible difference.
 

Texas82GP

Just-a-worm
Apr 3, 2015
7,988
18,696
113
Spring, Texas
I'd sill like to build a small block or LS powered first gen S10 blazer. 6 speed manual, maybe mini-tubs and a fairly irresponsible amount of power.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users

Clutch

Geezer
Apr 7, 2017
5,189
10,913
113
Brick NJ

airboatgreg

Comic Book Super Hero
Oct 2, 2016
2,867
3,115
113
When a star wars flick came out I put "Pod Racers Rule" on marquee
Unbelievable response from customers
 

Clutch

Geezer
Apr 7, 2017
5,189
10,913
113
Brick NJ
I'd sill like to build a small block or LS powered first gen S10 blazer. 6 speed manual, maybe mini-tubs and a fairly irresponsible amount of power.
I built a bunch of them years ago with small blocks the first 2 I did were before they made mounts and stuff for them even did one with a tune port I'll look I may have some pictures somewhere
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

Mikej89

Apprentice
Apr 1, 2014
83
30
18
When I was in high school in the late 1970's and my dad said "we need to find a '72 Charger R/T with a factory sunroof". I found a '70 440-4 SE R/T Challenger at a car show in the mid 1980's with a factory sunroof and the guy wanted $3,500 for it (I figured this was as close I was going to get) and my dad says "too much".

Turns out dad just didn't like Challengers and only liked Chargers. He told me that later. 99% of people given the choice between a '70 Challenger 440 and an '72 Charger 440 take the Challenger. Dad is the 1%.

Sure he didn't say '71? There's no such thing as a '72 Charger R/T as '71 was the last year... In '72 they only had the Charger Rallye and SE but either could come with the 440 engine.

The Challenger is the popular choice but bring a '71-74 Charger to a car show and you'll get lots of attention because you'll probably be the only person that has one. That's what I experienced with my dad and his '71 Charger Super Bee.
 

Mikej89

Apprentice
Apr 1, 2014
83
30
18
Haha, That Charger looks just like my dad's old charger. He had a 72 Charger SE with a 383 and 727. Like you i still love that car. Dont see many of those body styles around at all.

Unless non-original motor, '72 would have a 400. The last year for the 383 was '71.
 

UNGN

Comic Book Super Hero
Sep 6, 2016
3,048
3,264
113
Southlake, TX
Sure he didn't say '71? There's no such thing as a '72 Charger R/T as '71 was the last year... In '72 they only had the Charger Rallye and SE but either could come with the 440 engine.

He called it an R/T because he wanted the 440. We had a '68 383 4 speed and after telling people it was a 383, they'd ask if it was an R/T and he'd have to tell them, "R/T's got the 440". Sad even Dodge stopped calling them R/T's

I've always hated the non flush side markers of the '72's. Government regulations screwing up car styling. The '71's were the last years 1970's chryslers looked "clean". Dad didn't pay attention to that kind of stuff and is more of a big picture impression kind of guy.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: 1 user
Status
Not open for further replies.

GBodyForum is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com. Amazon, the Amazon logo, AmazonSupply, and the AmazonSupply logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.

Please support GBodyForum Sponsors

Classic Truck Consoles Dixie Restoration Depot UMI Performance

Contact [email protected] for info on becoming a sponsor