TURNA...remembering back to your post on putting a face to a name a brain fart is totally understandable.lolYes that is correct............ brain fart!!!
I think there are collectors out there looking for stock g bodies. probably not the basic v6 car with bench seats and wire wheel covers but definitely the hurst olds, 442's, gn's, gnx, mcss and so on. The limited production cars. I hate to see a gn with a chevy 350 in it. Can't stand a hurst olds with any different engine in it and a heater delete plate on the firewall. A 442 shouldn't have A big block chevy in it with a matte black paint job. There are only so many of these cars left and getting harder to find. These weren't power house cars but I think they are better factory than altered with aftermaket parts. That's what the all the other base models are for. Those are the canvas cars. Make them whatever you want and they are better than the stock 3.8 with the 2.42 rear. I altered my monte ss because the guy who had it before me trashed the engine so I had to do something with it. This may be the issue with some of these cars I see. Everyone is different and as long as your in a g body your alright in my book but please leave these limited number cars alone. Just my opinion. Thanks.I'm not picking on your statement in particular, but this reminded me of something I've been thinking about for a while in various discussions....Is anybody REALLY looking for dead stock G bodies (aside from GNX), or do most people think that way because of where the musclecar market went?
In my mind, the G body specialty cars (again, aside from GNX) do not have the so-called "brute power" of the muscle era, so little is lost by updating (backdating?) drivetrains to something with more power.
I just don't see people 20 years from now obsessing over having the "correct" 307 in their Olds, or HO305 in their Monte SS. I think it is more driven by the idea (belief? hope?) that "someday" the car will be worth way more than the same car with a different powertrain. Given the choice of the example Qdub asked about and a dead stock example in same condition, there is no question in my mind that I'd take the modified one....but I like "drivers" more than "collectors"
I think there are collectors out there looking for stock g bodies. probably not the basic v6 car with bench seats and wire wheel covers but definitely the hurst olds, 442's, gn's, gnx, mcss and so on. The limited production cars. I hate to see a gn with a chevy 350 in it. Can't stand a hurst olds with any different engine in it and a heater delete plate on the firewall. A 442 shouldn't have A big block chevy in it with a matte black paint job. There are only so many of these cars left and getting harder to find. These weren't power house cars but I think they are better factory than altered with aftermaket parts. That's what the all the other base models are for. Those are the canvas cars. Make them whatever you want and they are better than the stock 3.8 with the 2.42 rear. I altered my monte ss because the guy who had it before me trashed the engine so I had to do something with it. This may be the issue with some of these cars I see. Everyone is different and as long as your in a g body your alright in my book but please leave these limited number cars alone. Just my opinion. Thanks.
The owner of any limited car is that owners property and if he wants to drop a honda 4 banger in his gnx thats his choice even if i wouldnt do it. He doesn't have a duty to you or the world to treat his car like a rolling museum thats what museums are for. If he likes stock great.
This olds big block upgrade is also very tasteful and fun.
I'm very rarely a purist but one car in particular really bends me out of shape when messed with.
A Grand National HAS to have a turbocharged V6. Modified is fine but some stool pigeon dropping a N/A V8 (or any V8) ruins the cars character. Takes it from something special and makes it into just another Regal.
GBodyForum is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com. Amazon, the Amazon logo, AmazonSupply, and the AmazonSupply logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.