Might want to plug that vacuum port off on the front of the carb. Actually you need to hook your vacuum advance up to that port if it’s the one below the throttle blades.
Vacuum advance is hooked up on the other side. Vacuum modulator for the th350 goes there. Car is sitting waiting on an electric fan relay right now but thanks for looking out 👍Might want to plug that vacuum port off on the front of the carb. Actually you need to hook your vacuum advance up to that port if it’s the one below the throttle blades.
3932441- 1970 Chevrolet passenger car, Nova, Chevelle, Camaro. 350/250 h.p, 1.94/1.50 intake/exhaust, 76.26 cc ("single rectangle"). These are the average heads used on the 350 for '69 & '70. The better 350 heads of that year vintage ('96-'70) are the 3927186 ("double humps", same marking used on Vette 3927187 '69-'70) & 3947041 ("right angle triangle"), used in '69-'70 on the 300 h.p with same size valves with a 63.305 cc chamber. The LT1's in Vettes (370) & Z28's (360) had 2.02/1.60 valves with the same chambers. Vette oddites with the is the 3947041 heads are they have 2.02/1.60 valves with a 63.995 cc chamber, if I remeber right the same/similar to '69 DZ 302 heads.Not quite. Pulling the valve cover revealed they are 3932441 heads and from what ive read they are half decent. Does this valvetrain look beefed up at all? Never seen a set of stock ones so i have no idea what to compare them to. 10mm for reference
3932441- 1970 Chevrolet passenger car, Nova, Chevelle, Camaro. 350/250 h.p, 1.94/1.50 intake/exhaust, 76.26 cc ("single rectangle"). These are the average heads used on the 350 for '69 & '70. The better 350 heads of that year vintage ('96-'70) are the 3927186 ("double humps", same marking used on Vette 3927187 '69-'70) & 3947041 ("right angle triangle"), used in '69-'70 on the 300 h.p with same size valves with a 63.305 cc chamber. The LT1's in Vettes (370) & Z28's (360) had 2.02/1.60 valves with the same chambers. Vette oddites with the is the 3947041 heads are they have 2.02/1.60 valves with a 63.995 cc chamber, if I remeber right the same/similar to '69 DZ 302 heads.
They have a different combustion chamber tha the double humps so that will alter performance between the two but should be in the 9:1 range stock. But the unknown is what was done to them since there is the assume shop stamp on them so have chamber been altered, machined for 2.02/1.60 valves, a port job, what kind of valve springs, or milled? The unknown is what will make or break them being good heads or just another $100 set. I have a set of '69 dated 3947041 heads on my '70 CRE 350 that was worked on by a shop before they guy who sold them to me found them. The shop I had looked over them & found they have been ported, machined for a bigger dia, valve spring but retained the 1.94/1.50 valves. Now in theory (until get the car done & running) I have a 350 that was advertised at 300 h.p. that should hit that mark but I'll be happy with a 250 range. Until they are pulled & looked over by a good machine shop it's best to run with the idea they are stock 9:1/250 h.p. heads. Another thing you should do is look at the VIN pad in front of the passenger side head to see what that motor started life as, it should have a 3 letter code ('70 & up) starting with C for car or T for truck.So these are kind of like double humps but with larger chambers, lowering compression ratio? If the numbers stamped on the front are a job number from a shop does that mean theyve been milled a little? I read somewhere that if it has these heads and a standard flat top piston rebuild (motor was definitely rebuilt) that would put me in the ballpark of ~ 9:1 compression?
Yes the 441 was the sought after large chamber head years ago. Like was said, flowed the best of bad heads, and lowered compression. My friend had them on his Nhra stock eliminator nova and ran low 11’s with them. Not by choice it was his engine combo.So these are kind of like double humps but with larger chambers, lowering compression ratio? If the numbers stamped on the front are a job number from a shop does that mean theyve been milled a little? I read somewhere that if it has these heads and a standard flat top piston rebuild (motor was definitely rebuilt) that would put me in the ballpark of ~ 9:1 compression?
GBodyForum is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com. Amazon, the Amazon logo, AmazonSupply, and the AmazonSupply logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.