Oldspower.com

Status
Not open for further replies.
You have to remember Chevy, because of the spoiled child attitude would throw tantrums if any other division got the edge in performance cars. The Rocket 88, Olds version of the Corvette, was a much better handling car and way more power. It was way better than the Corvette or Thunderbird. Harley Earl made multiple designs, some were his known personal cars. He was baffled by GM's decision not to make it a production car. Same goes for the Olds 455 Hemi, Chevy cried when they saw it made 650 HP. Never saw production. The flat cams did happen, some occasionally even broke in half. We had a couple of OK Chevy trucks. Dad's 78 1/2 tononly went 280,000 km on it's original motor till the bottom end went, so so in my books, very well taken care of. Our 75 Cutlass went over 300,000 miles under a lot of abuse under my ex brother in law. We sold it for scrap with a seized on brake caliper and a knock. Wrecker sold it, stayed on the road another 5 years. He blew up his Chevelle's high performance 327, couldn't blow up the Olds 350 despite ditch jumping. The TH350 was no prize either dying behind low power cars, saw a few, could have been the change in ATF, some claim whale oil was removed or GM was just slipping in quality. Either way the LS is king, Anubis on here is a good example, the sbc is finally not the engine of choice for the masses.
 
I've had experience with quite a few 70s SBCs. Really never saw any cam issues till they took zinc out of the oil. After that I saw issues with all non roller engines. Reason you'd hear more issues with SBC cams at that time is there were far more SBCs on the road than sbos
 
Oldspower was great. Was my go to site when I got my first cutlass. My older neighbor told me about site and then it was gone too soon.
 
You are a dying breed as well. The LS Gen 3/4 are weak down low stock and just plain weak in heavy trucks. A few bolt on parts in lighter cars is supposed turn the tables. The Gen 5 V8 5.3 is an incredibly quick revving monster compared to old 5.3. I am all for technology, I would buy an SRT Challenger, new 5.0 Mustang or SS Camaro which aren't as ugly as they were before I would waste the time putting a high tech motor in a G body. My Challenger will run silly circles around my 88 CSC in the corners, it would take thousands of dollars to match my SE, let alone the SRT, Hellcat, Mustang GT or Camaro SS. Sorry guys, our G body cars can't compete without serious dollars and know how. I will drive mine Olds powered and be unique if nothing else.

I agree that the new muscle cars offer plenty of performance and that it would cost a lot to make a G Body that would hold its own against them. But, how much does one of those new muscle cars cost? $40k+. I think if I had that much to spend on a G Body, I could build a pretty badass car that should perform very well.
 
I agree that the new muscle cars offer plenty of performance and that it would cost a lot to make a G Body that would hold its own against them. But, how much does one of those new muscle cars cost? $40k+. I think if I had that much to spend on a G Body, I could build a pretty badass car that should perform very well.
Exactly. And should you throw that cash in a g body you'd end up with a car that retained the value better than a new muscle car.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Texas82GP
Exactly. And should you throw that cash in a g body you'd end up with a car that retained the value better than a new muscle car.
Are you drunk and high? Nice G bodies with good paint go for $2500 here. I saw a decent 87 442 on Kiijji, needed a repaint to be really nice car, talking paint a bit faded, no rust, sell for 5 grand. I was very tempted, should have. My 88 CSC will be a racer, Olds V8 and drive train will be the only part with any value and the motor, only to an Olds V8 nuts like myself.
 
10 years from now a mustang or a challenger will be a $2500 car. And after a $40k build a g body would be worth a lot more lol
 
10 years from now a mustang or a challenger will be a $2500 car. And after a $40k build a g body would be worth a lot more lol
Keep telling yourself that. Other than the GN, these were compromise cars, weak emission engines etc. The metric chassis moved backwards in handling from the earlier A and later B body in my books. Better cars than Ford or Dodge had but that isn't saying much.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

GBodyForum is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com. Amazon, the Amazon logo, AmazonSupply, and the AmazonSupply logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.

Please support GBodyForum Sponsors

Classic Truck Consoles Dixie Restoration Depot UMI Performance

Contact [email protected] for info on becoming a sponsor