Phoenyx said:Maybe I'm wrong, but that just makes no sense to me. So what you are saying is that the weight of parts that are not being supported by the springs will affect the spring rate? I agree that it might affect the handing a bit because of the weight. But our cars have a lot more weight up front than in the back. And for handling, isn't the '50/50' balance what everyone wants to achieve? And then then adding more wight to the rear help this?
I don't know, I'm not an expert in any way. And I'm not arguing with you. I am just trying to learn as much about suspension as I can.
I know your not arguing and neither am I...50/50 is what you want but with a metric (G body) circle track we never could never get close to a 50/50 even with all the tin we got rid of. We could achieve 50/50 with the lead we put in to increase the back end weight but then the car would be too heavy. We could load up our street cars to achieve a 50/50 but you'll probably have to add about 400 pounds in the back end to get close and then handling won't be a concern cause you won't get enough speed to worry about it....lol
We ran a 7.5 rear end because we had to run what the car came with. We could have if we found one used a 8.5 Grand National rear end but we never had the need for it. We never has any issues with the rear end in the metric and we ran a 7.5 for years. We now run a1980 camaro in the Nascar Whelan super stock series which has the 8.5 rear end and we have broken the flange off of two right hand axles due to the stress of left hand turns so we have a set of strange axles now...I don't know how stock 7.5 axles would have handled the stress since at this tack we are hitting highers speeds than the speed we hit at our old track. There are some metrics at this new track but they all run strange axles
and I just saw your post about the weight of the rear ends...I'll see what I can dig up...