I had a 2.5 Turbo Dodge Shadow. It was astounding fast off the line for what it was. Well, until it blew the transmission, though.
I had a 2.5 Turbo Dodge Shadow. It was astounding fast off the line for what it was. Well, until it blew the transmission, though.
Seriously?
K cars did some what save Chrysler in the '80's & brought us the mini van revolution. Then again it wasn't a good thing.There was nothing good about any K car. The Turbo cars were usually just blown up. I worked on way too many of the regular ones. We seriously had 7 in a 8 car shop, all with major problems. Horrible engines and horrible cars. The 5 spd did make the base cars almost driveable, the vast majority were autos. I said I hate the early GM EFI fwd cars, driveability issues that were hard to diagnose etc, compared to any K car, they were the best cars ever.
My buddy had a CSX and was quick, but the ‘80s sucked from a performance standpoint. I had a ‘70 455 Skylark and spent my teenage career proving that point. Even a real GN sucked by the ‘60s-‘70s standard, and by today’s standard. Yea, I know about a Turbo T running in the 13s and all the BS everybody was trying to get excited about, but any legitimate street car with M&H Racemasters would a$$hone a stock-ish GN by many carlengths. They were what the rich kids had that didn’t hang around my blue collar (built not bought) crew. The GN owners don’t act much different now. Try to speak to one of them at a car show. But I digress..............
K cars did some what save Chrysler in the '80's & brought us the mini van revolution. Then again it wasn't a good thing.
I'll just leave this here
View attachment 158603
GBodyForum is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com. Amazon, the Amazon logo, AmazonSupply, and the AmazonSupply logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.