Based on the grille, I assume that year Bourb has a 6.5 TD. I guess the computer that drives the injection also locks the torque converter?
Last edited:
It's a naturally aspirated 6.2 with an aftermarket ATS turbocharger kit the trans is a 700R4.Based on the grille, I assume that year Bourb has a 6.5 TD. I guess the computer that drives the injection also locks the torque converter?
That Deere powerplant would have been so much better than any of the V8 diesels, especially the Olds diesel that killed domestic passenger car diesels for decades. My friend's Dad bought a new 93 Dodge Cummins 5 spd 3/4 ton 4x4 in 93 to pull his Cattle trailer, hated everything about it but the powertrain. Traded it on a 93 GMC 6.2 1/2 ton 4x4, 6.5 TD didn't come out till 94. Despite the big power loss, a much more refined, modern truck.Yeah but when you have a Cummins you need an antidote to stop from rolling coal, and shouting "6 in a row built to tow" while you rattle away in your dodge designed 2 decades before with solid axles and chocking on exhaust fumes from the holes that enividably propopgate through the Swiss cheese floor pans in your 1st Gen Ram 😛
Word had it from my time at Deere engineering, GM and Deere had a joint venture on the Detroit diesel program in the 70's early 80's. Deere almost had a small 6 cyl turbo diesel for a square body and the GM/Deere relationship turned sour and it never happened.
Could you imagine in 1986 having the choice between a Deere powered Chev, IH powered Ford, or a Cummins Dodge? The Deere Chev would have dominated. Reliability and power of a Cummins with the body and chasis quality equal to Ford.
GBodyForum is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com. Amazon, the Amazon logo, AmazonSupply, and the AmazonSupply logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.