I was hoping that you would drop those pistons/rods in as is as a guinea pig, but I get it 🙂
Good excuse to validate your timing and put a pointer on it!
Good excuse to validate your timing and put a pointer on it!
Mine goes to 6,000....
I was hoping that you would drop those pistons/rods in as is as a guinea pig, but I get it 🙂
Good excuse to validate your timing and put a pointer on it!
I would think it's more about longevity than power. A smoothly operating system is easier on components as most of the stresses have been relieved, letting them work as designed without premature failure.I for one am glad you are doing the whole balancing act. I've often wondered but have never seen it documented about testing an unbalanced engine compared to balanced. In other words, power differences and harmonics. It'd be interesting to see
Hey, my mild Olds 350 saw 5000+. My fragile 403 stroker will see 5500. We don't need rod bending boost or a million rpm to make power.
I have 3.50 rear gears with 26 inch tires so at 6500 rpm I'm at 200mphVery true, I need 6800 rpm to hit 160mph though.
This exact scenario happened when I was building the wagon... project scope creep. Truth is a basic cam and an LSA supercharger would have netted a better result.
The appeal of a 700hp JY engine is undeniable. The appeal of a 1000hp reliable combo is equally undeniable - but, much more expensive.
Mine goes to 6,000....
GBodyForum is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com. Amazon, the Amazon logo, AmazonSupply, and the AmazonSupply logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.