It was painful to admit at the time, but, after our mustangs we bought a 2018 f150 because everything about it seemed superior to the silverados/Sierra when we visited dealerships. So I get it.The only reason I'd consider a ecoboost expedition is that they are 7-10 grand less than a similar year and mile tahoe and it has the towing capability I want. Plus it fits in my garage unlike a long wheel base F150. If the expedition was available with the coyote I'd probably go for it over the f150. The tahoe, expedition chassis always seem to rust less than the similar F150/Sierra options despite them being the same thing. Honestly a short wheel base Gen3 Coyote 10 speed expedition is what I'd have ideally. The Ford user controls are superior to GM in my experience based on my wife's fusion.
Most recent list I saw was this copied list job for you, and the 'cutoff' year where you had to have the package varies by state.That's news to me on emissions testing. It's not a concern in MN yet (house keeps proposing CA emissions req. on new cars).
CO, CT, DR, ME, MD, MA, NJ, NM, NY, NV, OR, PA, RI, VA, VT, WA, DC.
I've been paying CLOSE attention to that because we've been looking intently at land purchases in many states that made the changes.
If you lived there you never really noticed the changes. For example, if you bought a new gmt800 2500 series burb/yukon with the 8100 vortec you got 4 cats instead of two and a different flash, sensors, etc. But it was already there new.
But when you bring the car into the state for the first time, and go for your local inspection and emissions test, the underhood decal is a dead giveaway and the computer will know its not a CA limits pkg when its plugged in.
Sure. Oddly enough some zl1 camaros and ss cars were considered not legal in CA for sale based on brake pads... interesting story. But sure, anything they want to sell in CA needs to meet the standards so anything with any volume usually has its own certification and version.Did they make CA spec emissions, say 2016 tahoes? I assumed CA spec emissions cars stayed in the 80's.
I used to live outside Atlanta in different suburbs, to the north, to the east... now I'm in non-emissions country on the coast. Many manufacturers make two versions of cars, 'federal' tier and 'carb' tier. 3 of our mustangs were bought new in Georgia. 1 we drove to Charlotte to get the color and options I wanted. All are 'federal' and clearly didn't say '50 state'... for 2 years they're exempted anyways, but, they did diligently pass the GA standards.. which were federal, not CA.I know metro Atlanta has emissions testing, and even if it doesn't couldn't you just get the car in spec and it would pass?
Comparing to some California equipped cars at shows there were visible cat and exhaust differences, so, I'd presume o2 sensitivities and software tables varied as well.
I'm just keeping a weary eye on the whole shebang. One sister moved to CA back in the 1990s, and we spend a helluva time dealing with reliable transportation for her. It was how I learned the world of integrating out-of-market emissions spec vehicles and that you didn't necessarily just take any car anywhere you wanted. Same deal with non-title states, all that paperwork crap.
So, when it comes to our mustantmgs.....its iffy and depends on the state. Everything is electrified in records so some states dmv I hear will flag you at reg for deficient MSO. Others just want to test you and say you didn't make it.
It's a doable thing with worst case workarounds if you have the access, but, something that needs to be kept in mind