I am going to vote for the electric fans over the clutch fan for efficiency. Yes, you still have to pay the piper on parasitic load on the crankshaft VS. electrical load on the alternator, but since you have the battery and the alternator working together, the load on the engine doesn't increase linearly with RPM.
With a clutch fan, there is parasitic load from the moment you start the car until the moment you shut it off. The warmer the engine is and the faster the engine is spinning, the more horsepower it takes to spin it. When you are pushing the engine to high RPM's is when you will see the most losses from the fan.
With an electric fan, there is zero parasitic load until the engine is hot enough to need the fan (assuming you have a properly set up controller). Once the fan is called for there is a fixed amount of load regardless of RPM until it switches off and any lost charge from the battery is replaced.
This actually is a bigger deal on a smaller engine than a big one, since there isn't a bunch of horsepower to spare. It works out to about 3-4hp fixed parasitic load for the car VS 10-12hp for the clutch fan. Not life-changing, but worthwhile to do.
With a clutch fan, there is parasitic load from the moment you start the car until the moment you shut it off. The warmer the engine is and the faster the engine is spinning, the more horsepower it takes to spin it. When you are pushing the engine to high RPM's is when you will see the most losses from the fan.
With an electric fan, there is zero parasitic load until the engine is hot enough to need the fan (assuming you have a properly set up controller). Once the fan is called for there is a fixed amount of load regardless of RPM until it switches off and any lost charge from the battery is replaced.
This actually is a bigger deal on a smaller engine than a big one, since there isn't a bunch of horsepower to spare. It works out to about 3-4hp fixed parasitic load for the car VS 10-12hp for the clutch fan. Not life-changing, but worthwhile to do.