That 9.4 dynamic is about 1 full point higher than what's normally recommended on pump gas safely (8.5 max w/alum heads).Did you check the link I provided? Yes. Because your camshaft bleeds off some of that compression. Put all of your info into the calculator. -7.8cc, .010 deck surface, 64cc chamber, 4.190 gasket diameter, 64° IVC, 4.155 bore, 3.75 stroke, 5.7" rods.
We'll have to agree to disagree. Stock 1996 LT1 had 11.0-1 compression so your 8.5-1 on the street is out the window.That 9.4 dynamic is about 1 full point higher than what's normally recommended on pump gas safely (8.5 max w/alum heads).
If a guy is good w/tuning,,,, maybe. If he's asking this sort of question on an internet forum, it's unlikely. Also, the actual IVC timing for that cam was 38° using their calculator (based on .050 numbers) & not 64°.
What heads (steel or aluminum)?
Motor sounds like it needs a different set of pistons.
No. A smaller cam retains low speed pressure (IV closes sooner).I thought smaller cam bleeds off low speed compression, it had a Crower 00351 solid flat tappet camshaft in it.
We will agree to disagree.... Your link supplied the source info (I'm just familiar w/it). They recommend 8:1 max dynamic comp ratio w/steel heads & 8.5:1 w/aluminum.We'll have to agree to disagree. Stock 1996 LT1 had 11.0-1 compression so your 8.5-1 on the street is out the window.
GBodyForum is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com. Amazon, the Amazon logo, AmazonSupply, and the AmazonSupply logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.