Today didn't do jack on any projects what-so-ever.
I did, however, count my blessings that I'm not actively living in the rust best these days.
Saw this picture in a gmt800 thread...
View attachment 171537
Apparently there's Northern guys driving things like this around ??? (!!!)
I am actually in the process of purchasing this hangar. I'm so happy to be in this position, I really do hate renting, and since this is a appreciating asset I'll make a buck when the time comes to sell. Or I could rent it for passive income. I'm not sure if it's subject to capital gains tax or not?
If you rent it, you must count the "net" passive rental as income, which adds in with your gross income. There's always "upkeep costs" that can reduce taxes owed, of course. But you will need to keep good records. Tax laws may vary from state to state on rental income reporting and what is deductible, of course. DO NOT get into the depreciating game if you can help it. It may save you some taxes now, but if you ever go to sell it and you make money on the deal, you may have to add those "savings" back in and pay taxes on that. Don't go by what a yokel like me would tell you on the interwebs. Consult your tax attorney or advisor. Rental property can be tricky tax-wise at first until you get the hang of it. Just keep your eyes open if you do rent.
You don't get a title by buying a share of stock either, just a series of ones and zeroes in a computer program. Still subject to capital gains there too.That all makes sense, I just wonder since I don't get a title or anything by buying it how is the money I make by selling it taxed? There's not going to be much of a paper trail associated with it. I think I know who knows the answer.
Today didn't do jack on any projects what-so-ever.
I did, however, count my blessings that I'm not actively living in the rust best these days.
Saw this picture in a gmt800 thread...
View attachment 171537
Apparently there's Northern guys driving things like this around ??? (!!!)
Could be, but I am really not sold on that idea because I think they are trying to ABC sales it. That's probably what they have available and won't have the hoops for a bigger dish for a while or something but don't want to own it.Taking a shot in the dark here, but it sounds like their engineers are advising the sales side of things of a maximum negative offset they're willing to put out there, both from a material stress and a handling dynamics standpoint.
If they build it and something negative happens down the road - whether it's 'illegal' due to protrusion beyond the body or someone damages something as a result of improper use - they could be liable for having built it.
Not saying that's the case, or that they're right. But something like that could be a reason.
Yeah, I just feel I could buy something off the shelf for a ton cheaper with a 3.5 lip in the back and probably almost nothing up front. Let alone shrinking the widths of the current wheels on there by an 1" each. Am I wrong for thinking if I go forged it should be properly spaced which would allow for the same if not more of a wheel there?They may be doing a failure analysis or they are trying to make it safe for you with respect to fitment.
And I know I harp on this a lot, and it doesn't necessarily apply to you, but people buy the "what's the widest wheels" wheels because they are risk adverse/lazy. Everyone wants that ultra custom maximum effort look - but only want to lift their wallet. And even then only open it long enough to get "a" solution... and their 7/10th safe solution gets them their dopamine hit without the disappointments.
We both know you know what you want.
So you need to demand they be made to your specs, given a valid reason why not... or go elsewhere.
I totally get they have to be safe and have their name on the line, but measuring the front has the ability to have 4 1/8" to be flush with the cladding and 7 5/16" to be close in the rear. I just don't see why I would spend over 4k now that they upcharged to powder the entire wheel instead of brushed outer and raw inner for something that I could have for probably 1/4 of the price and have it within a few days? Am I missing something here?Agreed. If you did your due diligence for validating the numbers you provide to them & are willing to accept the fall-out if they don't fit, they should build what you want if it's within their safety margin.
Yeah, I just feel I could buy something off the shelf for a ton cheaper with a 3.5 lip in the back and probably almost nothing up front. Let alone shrinking the widths of the current wheels on there by an 1" each. Am I wrong for thinking if I go forged it should be properly spaced which would allow for the same if not more of a wheel there?
Yeah they were definitely trying to get me to settle, they sent over this:You should get exactly what you are willing to pay for, within the limits of the physical constraints of the materials and the processes to design and build them of course.
I am not the kind of person who settles. I don't believe you should either.
GBodyForum is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com. Amazon, the Amazon logo, AmazonSupply, and the AmazonSupply logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.