Amazing the difference that a 60' time makes, eh?
But, yes - you are still leaving a lot of time on the table by short-shifting it below 7000rpms. Understood that making clean runs makes that near impossible get consistency/feel. And yes, numerically your gear change has opened up a world of possibilities, 1-4 vs. 2-5 down the strip. The torque multiplication factor of the 4.30s and first gear are only an advantage when traction is present. Otherwise you'll find leaving in second to be a benefit/compromise.
I am also, personally, pleased to see how much our cars had in common with respect to power production. Seems like I was on the right track to my goals before... well... you know.
The rod bending situation will forever be known as THE INCIDENT (I couldn't find a GIF from the dodgeball cheerleader scene).
Interesting that your 5.3 non IC, 180f IAT, 13 degree of timing, 16 PSI setup picks up 30mph in the last 1/8 which is identical to my 6.0, 19 degrees, 10psi with 160 IAT.
Yeah the 60 ft difference is tremendous. The .1 at the 60 is a consistent .2 for the overall pass. It's wishful thinking but my best 60 ft is 1.62, so 2.1-1.62 = .48 sec. .48*2 == .96, so 12.02-.96 = 11.06. That's a bit more tuning away from a 10 at my existing boost level. That's good affirmation for a 10.
The car ran identical 1/8 to 1/4 time, 4.1 second at 6700rpm shift vs 6200 with 2 more psi, so rough guess 500rpm got me an additional 30-40hp, and boost got me an additional 30-40hp, basically 15-18hp/psi is what it looks like it's trending
I'm warming up to more RPM. 6200 to 6800 showed reward, i'll try 7000 next time 🙂
Last edited: