Ive always liked the thought of a big block build, but then i heard an ls7 can be stroked to 455 and now thats my aim. this wont be for a long time since im still a broke college kid, but when it happens i plan on making it scary.
Who me? I never said that. I know that big inch small blocks make power and torque down low, but they *don't* rev high, and are more susceptible to breaking at higher RPMs, as opposed to a big block, which tend to be more reliable. Actually see what kornball426 said here...SScamino said:I'd say false to your claims of a "big inch small block has to rev to make power". I'm pretty sure this is a clue. http://www.chevyhiperformance.com/techa ... to_11.html chevy high performance built a 400 with afr heads. This is non stroked as well and it has a measley 477 ft lbs at 2500 rpm and breaks through 500 at 3000 rpm. Not only does it make torque down there but up top it makes close to 500 horsepower at 5600 rpm.... Lets not even talk LSX numbers.
Thank you, well said.kornball426 said:... That way you have a big motor that makes big power but is tame and reliable and isn't stretched to it's limits at all.
454muscle said:I didn't want to have a hot running engine, or high compression, or worry about breaking parts or revving high (limitations of the small blocks with big block cubes). I wanted reliablity and the power too. Hence my preferences changed.
Big block is king.
dan2286 said:454muscle said:That doesn't make sense to me. EFI is supposedly superior to a mechanically operated air/fuel intake, because it is electronically receiving input before putting out the fuel jet. My crate motor puts out 25 more HP with EFI than the carburated version.megaladon6 said:yeah, with the emissions programming still in the ECU you could do better with a carb, but there's no way EFI will be less power at "full" tune.
I think he meant with the stock tune on the pcm, the engine will not put out nearly as much power as a computer tuned with no worry about emissions requirements.
-83MONTESS- said:No the 5.7 LS1 has more power. I think your thinking of the Vortec 5300 and the Vortec 5700.fatso86 said:yea the 5.3 is better 5.7... that what everyone tells me when they being there trucks in my dads garage..
papabearxl said:I've got an LQ4 (6.0L LS motor in my SIerra 2500), and in stock form in this heavy truck (and after buying the truck I really am not satisfied with the truck, so this isn't a "praise my truck it's got an LS in it" post), it does pulls alright....in a considerably lighter car I am sure it would do great.....
Yeah, you ain't telling me nothing! LOLcustom442 said:papabearxl said:I've got an LQ4 (6.0L LS motor in my SIerra 2500), and in stock form in this heavy truck (and after buying the truck I really am not satisfied with the truck, so this isn't a "praise my truck it's got an LS in it" post), it does pulls alright....in a considerably lighter car I am sure it would do great.....
papa, that 2500 isn't going anywhere fast without a duramax with 1000 tq 8)
GBodyForum is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com. Amazon, the Amazon logo, AmazonSupply, and the AmazonSupply logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.